Braves Journal
  • About
  • Patreon
  • Rumors
  • Roster
  • Statcast
  • Payroll

Select Page

Really, we all watched this in the seventies game thread: July 26, Braves at Brewers

Posted by Mac Thomason | Jul 26, 2009 | Game Threads 2010 | 132 |

Share:

Rate:

PreviousBrewers 4, Braves 0
NextBraves 10, Brewers 2

About The Author

Mac Thomason

Mac Thomason

Related Posts

Small-brained game thread: July 4, Nats at Braves

Small-brained game thread: July 4, Nats at Braves

July 4, 2009

Let’s get back on track game thread: Marlins at Braves, June 5

Let’s get back on track game thread: Marlins at Braves, June 5

June 5, 2008

Oh, great, Fox game thread:  DBacks at Braves, May 24

Oh, great, Fox game thread: DBacks at Braves, May 24

May 24, 2008

It’s not even June yet game thread: May 27, Braves at Giants

It’s not even June yet game thread: May 27, Braves at Giants

May 27, 2009

132 Comments

  1. Nick
    Nick on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 am

    I wasn’t alive in the 70s, so I accept blame for nothing.

    Reply
  2. Parish
    Parish on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 am

    From the previous thread:

    I really think Heyward starts 2010 on the Atlanta roster, but I do not expect him to get a September callup.

    Regarding Andruw, I think the “rumors” are just speculation based on his precipitous dropoff in hitting ability at an early age. Made it seems like he both peaked and declined about 4-5 years ahead of time.

    Maybe, it was just Terry Pendleton.

    Reply
  3. braves14
    braves14 on July 26, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Probably it was the wear and tear of playing nearly every game for a decade along with a lack of conditioning.

    Unless Heyward finishes at like .360 or higher with a lot of homers at AA, I really don’t want to see him start 2010 in Atlanta. We all saw Schafer this year. I’d rather him come up in June 2010 with just a couple more months of seasoning. Don’t want to rush him and screw him up.

    Reply
  4. ububba
    ububba on July 26, 2009 at 11:02 am

    I loved “Happy Days” until all those ’50s characters started growing ’70s hair on the show. Pottsie with the blow-dried look just didn’t work for me. He should’ve stayed dweeby.

    That, of course, and the “Jump the Shark” episode. By then, they’d certainly run out of ideas.

    Off the Yankee Stadium (to see the legendary Sergio Mitre). Go Braves…

    Reply
  5. kc
    kc on July 26, 2009 at 11:07 am

    The Braves will handle Heyward the same way they handled Hanson this year to avoid giving Heyward the super-2 status.

    Reply
  6. Parish
    Parish on July 26, 2009 at 11:19 am

    3- What does Schafer have to do with Heyward? These are two different players with different skill sets. Look at the plate discipline throughout their minor league careers. Also, consider that Schafer was primarily a pitcher 3.5 years ago and served about a half a year suspension in the interim.

    I was in favor of starting Schafer in the minors this year. I feel differently about Heyward.

    5- I also see the Hanson and Heyward situations as quite different. We have a plethora of options in the starting pitching department. Suffice it to say that is not the same case in the outfield.

    I also think Heyward is more likely to get a contract buying out his arb years. Pitchers’ futures are less certain than position players’ because of injury. This makes avoiding the earlier year of arb less important.

    Reply
  7. braves14
    braves14 on July 26, 2009 at 11:53 am

    At the end of this season, Parish, how many games will Heyward have played above A ball? 50? Do you really think it’s worth the risk over just 2 more months of seasoning?

    Reply
  8. Alex Remington (Another Alex R.)
    Alex Remington (Another Alex R.) on July 26, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Jason Heyward is the Riaan Spanjer-Furstenburg of the Southern League.

    Fun fact: Heyward is actually younger.

    Reply
  9. sdp
    sdp on July 26, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Nate McLouth, CF
    Martin Prado, 3B
    Yunel Escobar, SS
    Brian McCann, C
    Garret Anderson, LF
    Matt Diaz, LF
    Casey Kotchman, 1B
    Kelly Johnson, 2B
    Derek Lowe, RHP

    Reply
  10. Parish
    Parish on July 26, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    7- Seriously, how much do you think the risk goes down in 2 months?

    I will repeat that Heyward’s skills are much more advanced than were Schafer’s. Even Andruw’s, in my opinion. The guy may be ready right now.

    I suppose if decent options are available his debut could be delayed. That should not include a longer term contract or trading decent prospects for a rental.

    Do you think we should extend Garrett Anderson for the purpose of getting Heyward 2 more months in the minors?

    Reply
  11. braves14
    braves14 on July 26, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Seriously, how much do you think the risk goes down in 2 months?

    I think it could be very valuable. Actually, I would prefer to leave him in the upper minors for an entire season, but we don’t really have that luxury.

    Do you think we should extend Garrett Anderson for the purpose of getting Heyward 2 more months in the minors?

    Schafer will probably need more time at AAA too next year since he hasn’t played much there this year. So, we’d have a platoon in one corner and a hole in the other to begin the season, until Schafer’s ready to move McLouth over from center. I would be open to signing Anderson for another year if there aren’t any better cheap options.

    Reply
  12. Weldon
    Weldon on July 26, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    I don’t think Schafer is a valid comparison, considering he was injured the whole time he was up with Atlanta.

    Reply
  13. braves14
    braves14 on July 26, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    My point lies not primarily with the Schafer comparison, but that in general it isn’t a good idea to have guys in the majors after inadequate experience in the upper minors.

    Reply
  14. Parish
    Parish on July 26, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    I don’t think the words “in general” apply to Jason Heyward.

    Reply
  15. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    David O’Brien is the President of the Baseball Writer’s Association. He’s sitting on stage in Cooperstown, impressive. So who covering the Braves?

    Reply
  16. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    15,
    His pinch-writer, Carrol Rogers.

    Reply
  17. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Need to show more patience Martin.

    Reply
  18. braves14
    braves14 on July 26, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    I had a feeling KJ would get some ABs today.

    While the Braves aren’t publicly revealing a specific plan for Heyward, there’s a belief that he’ll complete this season with Mississippi and then spend the first half of the 2010 season with Triple-A Gwinnett. If he continues on his current path, by this time next year, there’s a good chance he’ll find himself playing in the Atlanta outfield.

    http://tinyurl.com/m2jyz7

    Reply
  19. ryan c
    ryan c on July 26, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    looper picked off escobar, but i didnt see him step off the mound.

    Reply
  20. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    I think Yunel has a point on that one. Looper did not really fake towards third like he’s supposed to — he looked more like he was going home.

    Reply
  21. Nathan
    Nathan on July 26, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Well, it looks like it cost us a run, in any case. Hopefully we can continue to make Looper work so that it does not matter.

    Reply
  22. Ron E.
    Ron E. on July 26, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    Yeah that was clearly an attempt to deceive the baserunner, the textbook definition of a balk, but of course baseball allows umpires to make up their own definitions so it wasn’t called.

    Reply
  23. Alex Remington (Another Alex R.)
    Alex Remington (Another Alex R.) on July 26, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Yet more evidence that the balk rule is completely absurd, of course, but Yunel needs to find a way to stop making outs on the basepaths.

    Reply
  24. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Back to the play, I think Bobby had Yunel running to stay out of the double play. I guess.

    Reply
  25. ryan c
    ryan c on July 26, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    smoltz getting roped again. man, something’s just not right.

    Reply
  26. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Prince really needs to eat some meat.

    Reply
  27. Tom
    Tom on July 26, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Is there something wrong with Chipper? Why is he out of the lineup?

    Reply
  28. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Just a routine day off.

    Reply
  29. Nathan
    Nathan on July 26, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Gameday has this ump as having a super-funky strike zone. There have been a couple obviously-outside strikes, and had the first two balls to Diaz as being on the corners, and there have been several of those kinds of calls.

    Reply
  30. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Ump has been pretty good.

    @25 It’s really sad seeing Smoltz getting lit up everytime out.

    KJ back up to his old tricks…

    Reply
  31. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Chipper rests on Sunday day games regularly. Ryan Church is out with hyper extended elbow. KJ is in because Looper gets hit hard by lefties.

    Reply
  32. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    The song, “More Beautiful You”? This segment has gotten absurd.

    Reply
  33. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    It’s Ryan Church.

    Reply
  34. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    You sure it’s not Jeff Porter?

    Reply
  35. jj3bagger
    jj3bagger on July 26, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    32- Pretty sure it’s Matt Diaz’s brother Jonny. I believe there was an article in the AJC a couple days ago. It’s up to #1 on the Christian charts these days.

    Reply
  36. Alex Remington (Another Alex R.)
    Alex Remington (Another Alex R.) on July 26, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    You know, a looper.

    Reply
  37. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    I was wrong. Got deked.

    Reply
  38. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    37,
    Who was it?

    Reply
  39. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    Has anyone called Prince Fielder “Tofu Panda” yet?

    Reply
  40. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    It was Matt Diaz. It’s his brother’s song. I heard “Christian rock” and just assumed it was Church.

    Reply
  41. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Fat man just missed that one…

    Reply
  42. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Sandoval isn’t called Kung Fu Panda because of his body shape, specifically. It was because of a play at the plate.

    Reply
  43. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    I know, but it’s really an easy extension.

    Reply
  44. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Fair enough.

    Reply
  45. FANcoeur
    FANcoeur on July 26, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Church hurt, Francoeur homers again with rival Mets.

    Fire Frank Wren.

    Reply
  46. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    I think I need to keep track of plays that Yunel makes that Diory wouldn’t have. There’s one.

    ADDED: Please don’t feed the Francosaur.

    Reply
  47. njbravesfan
    njbravesfan on July 26, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    45 settle, it will all come crashing down….

    Reply
  48. Nathan
    Nathan on July 26, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Lowe’s on course to pitch another 7 or 8 innings. This rotation is really really nice after the wrecks we’ve sent out there the last couple years.

    Reply
  49. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Go Francouer….

    Just terrible at-bats by Matt and Diaz with RISP

    EDIT: And Prado

    Reply
  50. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    48,
    To think that in 2007 we thought we could win with a rotation of Hudson, Smoltz, Chuck James, Buddy Carlyle, and Kyle Davies. With the all but incredible rotation depth of Jeff Bennett, Jo-Jo (and he was certainly all-Jo-Jo in 2007) Reyes, Mark Redmond, Lance Cormier, and Anthony Lerew.

    Reply
  51. barrycuda
    barrycuda on July 26, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    #30…………..just think how sad it would be if he was wearing a braves uni.

    Reply
  52. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    @51 Exactly.

    Reply
  53. mikemc
    mikemc on July 26, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Chipper’s absence really weakens this lineup. Opposing pitchers must appreciate it.

    Reply
  54. njbravesfan
    njbravesfan on July 26, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Man,Mark Redmond, was thinking of him the other day, he was atrocious! I actually felt bad for him.

    Reply
  55. Nathan
    Nathan on July 26, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Wow…the other team screwed up the bunt for once.

    To set up the double play…nice.

    Reply
  56. FANcoeur
    FANcoeur on July 26, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Why is a foul-tip into the catcher’s glove always an out?

    If it’s just barely popped up it is an out, seems it should be a foul-out too.

    Reply
  57. FANcoeur
    FANcoeur on July 26, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @56: Why isn’t I mean.

    Redman sucked.

    Reply
  58. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    Escobar and Prado could use the day off tomorrow. What is it now…11 games straight since the All-Star break?

    Reply
  59. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    56,
    Because the groundhog says so.

    Reply
  60. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    Please go to rightfield Matt.

    EDIT: Thanks.

    Reply
  61. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @57

    Because writing the rule that way would make outs far to easy to come by. Any foul tip being recorded as an out would lead to routine extra inning 1-0 games.

    Reply
  62. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    A Kotchbomb.

    Reply
  63. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    SHOCK!!!

    Reply
  64. Nathan
    Nathan on July 26, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Wooo, Kotch!

    I’m glad to see we broke it open after not getting the run in from third twice.

    Reply
  65. Tomas
    Tomas on July 26, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    Kotchmaniarocketbomb!

    Reply
  66. PWHjort
    PWHjort on July 26, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Kotchman has 5 HR this year. Only 1 Barely Enough. 2 No Doubters. And 2 Plentys. (Using the language of hittrackeronline.com)

    Reply
  67. sdp
    sdp on July 26, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Hell freezes over.

    Reply
  68. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    Uh, bullpen?

    Reply
  69. Hanan
    Hanan on July 26, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    mmm-k…I think Lowe’s done. When Jason Kendall, who reminds me of a small town motel clerk, takes you deep, you need to go.

    Reply
  70. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Boy that sinker was just sitting up there the whole inning for Lowe…he was lucky McClouth was playing center…

    Reply
  71. Marc
    Marc on July 26, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    Whew, I thought that was finding a gap. Good job Nate.

    Reply
  72. Mike N.
    Mike N. on July 26, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    BMAC

    Reply
  73. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Wow, Mac hits a HR but just foul, then takes a pitch, then crushes one

    Reply
  74. mraver
    mraver on July 26, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    I love it when Mac breaks out of a “slump”. 🙂

    Reply
  75. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    88 mph fastballs from Gonzo, nevermind next one was 92

    Reply
  76. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Now if Mac could only figure out lefthanders….

    Reply
  77. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Where are the Cox bashers? One of our expensive relievers pitched in a game, so I’m sure someone is pissed off about the mis-use and abuse.

    Reply
  78. Hanan
    Hanan on July 26, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Norton timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

    Reply
  79. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    KJ getting that trade value up, I like it

    Reply
  80. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    #77 – you think Gonzo shouldve been used there? I dont, I just didnt say anything about it

    Reply
  81. ryan c
    ryan c on July 26, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    norton is just not catching up to fastballs and looks dumb on all other pitches.

    Reply
  82. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Conrad/Barbaro >>> Norton

    Reply
  83. Jon K
    Jon K on July 26, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Are you implying your a Cox lover Sam Hutcheson?

    Reply
  84. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    You have a chance to blow the game open, you have Chipper Jones on the bench, and you send up… Greg Norton. Who not only isn’t hitting his weight, he isn’t hitting his systolic blood pressure, and is rapidly approaching his diastolic.

    Reply
  85. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    I have nothing but respect for Bobby Cox. I certainly approve of testing out Gonzalez’ stuff after the liner off his arm in a less than zero-tolerance atmosphere.

    Reply
  86. ryan c
    ryan c on July 26, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    sam, every time you provoke this argument, i will just simply post the proof of abuse. maybe you’ll see it enough to come around, although i dont mind gonzo pitching today.

    http://tinyurl.com/l58qpg

    Reply
  87. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    You don’t use Chipper there. You hold that bullet in case the Brewers come back and you need a big hitter/HR in the ninth.

    Reply
  88. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    That right there is why the Brewers haven’t had a Gold Glover since 1982.

    Reply
  89. Hanan
    Hanan on July 26, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    A reverse Prado? an inverse Prado? bizarro Prado?

    Reply
  90. anonymous lurker
    anonymous lurker on July 26, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Save your best hitter in case we blow a 4-run lead? Dumb.

    Reply
  91. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Ryan, I don’t consider usage charts to be proof of poor management decisions. When you only have three and a half reliable relievers and you’re in a lot of close games, those guys will get used a lot.

    Reply
  92. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    they wouldve walked Chipper with 1B open anyways, but Im always in favor of using anyone over Norton

    Reply
  93. ryan c
    ryan c on July 26, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    what about when the games are not close games?

    Reply
  94. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    I’d rather take the flier on Norton getting lucky and give Chipper the full day’s rest, at least with a decent size lead.

    Reply
  95. jj3bagger
    jj3bagger on July 26, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    It’s anti-hibernation mode, I can get used to this.

    Reply
  96. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Considering the Braves other options – Jeff Bennett, Manny Acosta, etc – I don’t consider 4 runs a “big lead.” I know that’s unpopular around here but for this team, this year anything less than a 5 run lead is something you need to get at least your set-up men into. And I’m a proponent of the “if he’s warmed up use him” theory of management as well.

    Reply
  97. mraver
    mraver on July 26, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    TPJ to be converted to a pitcher:

    http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/story/11988417/rss

    Reply
  98. Tom
    Tom on July 26, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    SAFE at first!!

    Reply
  99. Jon K
    Jon K on July 26, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    hopefully we’ll see medlen in the 9th

    Reply
  100. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    Hey Petey pitching for the 55TH time today, I believe we have a 6 run lead in the 8th. How about Logan, Acosta, or Medlen for the next two innings???

    Reply
  101. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    Sam, you’re not making any sense. The lead is small enough to use the top relievers, but too big to use your best pinch-hitting possibility? I don’t think swinging the bat a few times will hurt Chipper. I have a feeling that he took batting practice today.

    No Soriano in the ninth, please.

    Reply
  102. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    How long’s it been since Sori pitched?

    Reply
  103. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    He pitched Friday. With a big lead.

    Reply
  104. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    I hate to agree with Simpson but dammit, bend that freakin’ cap bill son.

    Reply
  105. anonymous lurker
    anonymous lurker on July 26, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Soriano for the 9th!

    Reply
  106. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Then I agree, don’t use him today.

    Reply
  107. Ethan
    Ethan on July 26, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    First game of series

    Reply
  108. ugalaw
    ugalaw on July 26, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    These guys with the straight cap bills are going to look back 20 years from now and want to go back in time and punch themselves in the face.

    Reply
  109. Jon K
    Jon K on July 26, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    day off tomorrow… u know that Cox is going to pitch soriano. God I hope he doesn’t

    Reply
  110. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    KJ = TRADE VALUE

    Reply
  111. spike (back in the ATL)
    spike (back in the ATL) on July 26, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Wow. That’s a pretty good game KJ.

    Reply
  112. lunatic96
    lunatic96 on July 26, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    KJ CRUSHED that homer.

    Reply
  113. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Jeepers. Prado’s going to get replaced if he doesn’t look out.

    And now Chipper hits… No, pulled back. Still…

    Reply
  114. ugalaw
    ugalaw on July 26, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Kelly Johnson has done more in one afternoon than he did in the entire month of June.

    Reply
  115. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Can Kelly play right?

    No he can’t, forgot.

    Reply
  116. mraver
    mraver on July 26, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    So I guess Kelly remembered how to hit.

    Reply
  117. Ethan
    Ethan on July 26, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Welcome back KJ

    Reply
  118. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Kelly can play LF and Anderson has a notable reverse split. Won’t happen but it’s nice to see the good KJ back for at least one game.

    Reply
  119. Tom
    Tom on July 26, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    Boys, don’t get overexcited. It’s just one game. Remember Schaefer’s first game?

    Reply
  120. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    GA is hitting .310 in the last month with 4 Hr’s, Id say he’s fine. We might be seeing Prado spell at 1st and 3rd a little more though. KJ could get moved for a reliever since all of the guys arms are falling off

    Reply
  121. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    Tom is right. Sorry.

    Garrett is fine. Church I think is batting like .214 since the trade, hope he can pick it up.

    Reply
  122. Sam Hutcheson
    Sam Hutcheson on July 26, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    Kelly Johnson has a little more history as a good ML player than Jordan Schafer.

    Reply
  123. jj3bagger
    jj3bagger on July 26, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    McLouth-Prado top of the order go 0-7, no Chipper in the lineup and 10 runs on the board, color me surprised.

    Reply
  124. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Tom, Ill choose to remember the player who posted an 800+ OPS the last two seasons compared to a rookie. KJ can hit and he’s shown it

    Reply
  125. Mark B.
    Mark B. on July 26, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    Yunel=Gold Glove?

    Reply
  126. hankonly
    hankonly on July 26, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Mac,

    You know it’s been a tough year when your analogies are all about medicine – as opposed to sex, food, cars, etc.

    Hang in there, dude.

    Reply
  127. Tom
    Tom on July 26, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Kelly also has a little more history of monthlong sucking than Jordan Schaefer.

    Anyway, well done Kelly. Hope you can keep it up.

    Reply
  128. Tony
    Tony on July 26, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    That’s the one thing that good KJ provides…Xtra base hits.

    Reply
  129. csg
    csg on July 26, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    mlbtr says the Dodgers are in serious discussions about receiving Martinez and Lee in exchange for Loney, Kershaw/Billingsley, + prospects

    Reply
  130. hankonly
    hankonly on July 26, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Kelly may be streaky in the extreme, but with Prado (and Infante), no reason not to ride the hot streak.

    Prado also makes the occasional Kelly-in-LF option viable.

    Reply
  131. Ethan
    Ethan on July 26, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    That would be stupid on the Dodgers part

    Reply
  132. Mac Thomason
    Mac Thomason on July 26, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Recapped.

    Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to Braves Journal and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Comments

  • Roger on Braves News: Sam Hilliard, 5 Best Spring Stories, 31 left in Camp
  • coop on Braves News: Sam Hilliard, 5 Best Spring Stories, 31 left in Camp
  • Roger on Braves News: Sam Hilliard, 5 Best Spring Stories, 31 left in Camp
  • tfloyd on Braves 5th SP Battle: Jared Shuster vs. Dylan Dodd
  • tfloyd on Braves 5th SP Battle: Jared Shuster vs. Dylan Dodd

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress

  • About
  • Patreon
  • Rumors
  • Roster
  • Statcast
  • Payroll