I was just getting ready to comment in the other thread. Then I hit refresh. Whew! That was a close one. Now, I can’t remember what I was going to say.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 2:28 pm
From the previous (duh)
AAR, I don’t think I see the relevance of J-school here one way or another. Access is critical for reporting true, but when the price is journalistic integrity and an arm’s length relationship, it has little value. On that score, the profession is almost beyond rehabilitation. Cooper and Miller were the end, not the beginning. Between the Washington Post “Salons” and the coverage of the Iranian uprising being better on Fark than Fox or CNN, combined with Fourniers of the world, there is just no credibility left. I think the unspoken reason why media is suffering these days is that the have lost credibility with the marketplace.
Marc Schneider
on July 17, 2009 at 2:33 pm
I don’t think you can really judge journalism as a whole by the actions of sportswriters, many of whom really aren’t journalists (although some have moved from sports to hard news and some have done both). It’s pretty clear that many sportswriters are people that just like sports and have some ability to write. The rewards for doing real sxpose journalism in sports isn’t that great. I doubt anyone would choose DOB as their first choice to cover Afghanistan. Let’s face it, many writers covering baseball don’t have the foggiest notion of statistical analysis; I can’t imagine a journalist covering serious news having such a limited understanding of a key part of his or her beat. At the same time, without bashing journalism, anyone that has seen a story written about something with which they are familiar realizes how often journalists get the story wrong.
Tony
on July 17, 2009 at 2:33 pm
The Cubs and their fans are here in DC, and I wish it would rain consistently hard for the next 3 days. Nevermind, that means they will just be wandering around the city annoying the hell out of everyone.
I think Bobby views relievers as failed starting pitchers and treats them as such.
Johnny
on July 17, 2009 at 2:36 pm
But on the other hand an appearance may consist of just one pitch. I dunno Mac, you want a starter to make 30 appearances and pitch somewhere near 200 innings. But over use of a reliever is 50 games even when the guy has thrown just 38 innings? Ok, I reckon. But shouldn’t it be more granular like the number of pitches thrown per appearance or something?
#5 thats the old school thought process.
Marc Schneider
on July 17, 2009 at 2:36 pm
I’m going to the Cubs-Nats game on Saturday with my daughter. We went to a Cubs game a couple of years ago and she still talks about how much beer the Cubs fan in front of us drank.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Marc –
None of the references in #3 were sportswriters.
But I will extend the analogy a bit – both the sportswriters and the news heavyweights are getting flanked on the analysis side by the blogosphere. Guys like Nate Silver on the politics side are taking the information and doing just as good (better, imho) of translating it into meaning, and it’s even more of a thrashing on the sportswriting side. All the media companies have left to sell IS the stories they get from their privileged access, which is why they will write whatever they need to in order to keep it.
edit – I can’t imagine a journalist covering serious news having such a limited understanding of a key part of his or her beat.
I must have a much richer imagination than most, because I have met and read plenty of “serious” reporters that were pretty limited in their broader understanding of subject.
There is probably a way to roughly calculate the impact of innings v. appearances. However, there are two reasons to think that appearances are probably more important than innings for a reliever. First, as noted, there are warmup pitches, which aren’t measured but certainly strain a pitcher’s arm. Second, if you pitch on back-to-back days, there’s no chance to recover from the first day. Runs like Moylan has had, pitching four days in a row — that can’t be good. In this case, you’re not talking long-term cumulative difficulties, but the possibility of hurting yourself throwing when your arm hasn’t had a chance to heal.
Marc Schneider
on July 17, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Spike,
You make good points and I can’t really argue (although I don’t agree that the media companies provide no value. But their resources have shrunk to the point where it is harder and harder for them to do a good job.) My point was that sportswriters, I think, are especially egregious and I don’t really consider their job to be journalism.
cliff
on July 17, 2009 at 3:21 pm
and Mac @ 9,
Also, “loss of effectiveness” plays in.
Probablly the way to determine maximum bullpen useage before effectiveness loss or breakdown possibility would be to run an analysis of the Red Sox pen for the last 6 years. I bet Bill James and Theo and the gang have it figured pretty damn closely.
I have put it on here before but Jim Leyland has, for many years, kept his relievers’ appearances at no more than the prorated portion of the season represented by 75 divided by 162. That is, they are never on pace for more than 75 appearances. He has been pretty damn successful at it, too.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 3:22 pm
when do we retire glavin & smoltzie’s jersey’s???
Jon K
on July 17, 2009 at 3:24 pm
Nick
If gonzo and O’flaherty were available last night, I’d hope cox would have had enough sense to use one of them in the 9th besides soriano. I was saying using Soriano was a mistake because I thought gonzo and o’flaherty were available. Clearly if both of them weren’t then soriano was the right play. But if you sit here and try to say using soriano in that situation (if gonzo and o’flaherty were available) was the right move then I’m sorry but your a fool
I gotta recuse myself from the WaPo salon debate. And anyway, we’re getting close to politics. Obviously, what Nate Silver provides is tremendous value added to the public discourse. I think that investigative journalism is too.
Too many sportswriters feel too comfortable with not asking tough questions, and instead resting on tired cliches like “he’s got a tired arm” or “he’s due.” I don’t think that means that the profession of journalism is pointless, I think it means that it needs to do better.
That having been said, the majority of news stories that you read in the blogosphere or watch on TV are either broken or driven by print reporters, who are capable of providing value-added coverage not just day of, but also day after and many days after that. The broadsheet allows for a much longer attention span for dirt-diggers to talk to people who may not want to talk at first and find new information that isn’t readily available on the surface. Nate Silver crunches data that other people provide, and he crunches it in interesting ways. Journalism involves both finding information and contextualizing it.
There’s a lot of crap, but there’s a lot of good stuff.
Marc Schneider
on July 17, 2009 at 3:43 pm
@13,
I may be a fool by your lights, but I don’t understand how you can say it was wrong to use the closer in a relatively close game after he had not pitched in four days simply because of the possibility that you might need him the next day.
And is it beyond your ability to avoid calling people names?
sansho1
on July 17, 2009 at 3:44 pm
I don’t really consider their job to be journalism.
To the extent that you seem to be defining “journalism” as “investigative journalism”, maybe not. But a good sportswriter does practically every other kind of writing that can be found in what we used to call the newspaper, just in a sporting context. Event coverage, courtroom reporting, business, opinion, historical pieces, obits, lifestyle, etc. They’re generalists by trade, and not uncommonly the best writers at any given outlet.
Dusty
on July 17, 2009 at 3:45 pm
Lineup per DOB:
LINEUP TONIGHT:
1. McLouth
2. Prado
3. Chipper
4. McCann
5. Anderson
6. Escobar
7. Church
8. Kotchman
9. Jurrjens
For Mets, Francoeur hitting fifth, providing — ahem — protection for cleanup hitter Sheff.
Tony
on July 17, 2009 at 3:47 pm
@12 After John wins his World Series with the Red Sox, I think he will retire. So his will probably be next summer.
JoeyT
on July 17, 2009 at 3:54 pm
The Sox are offering Lugo along with paying all of his salary but the minimum (the logic being if they release him, they’d have to pay that anyway). He’s a pretty useless player, but he’d be free. I don’t want him now, but a week ago, I’d be hoping that the Braves would trade Francoeur for him.
I still can’t believe Wren got a useful player for that guy.
PeteOrr
on July 17, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Anyone ever heard of a manager having a bullpen rotation to correspond with a starting rotation? For instance, every Kawakami start could also be a Medlen “finish” – count on 5-6 innings from KK and 3-4 from Medlen. Have corresponding bullpen “finishers” for every starter, and maybe use your stopper (Soriano) in the most crucial situation of the game, regardless of inning. This gives everyone scheduled rest and prevents the beating of dead horses.
barrycuda
on July 17, 2009 at 3:57 pm
let me get this straight………….Bobby has his closer with four days rest in a save situation against a division rival and he shouldnt use him??…….i think he should have used him no matter who else was available…or maybe we should seal him in a glass box so he’ll be well rested in september when we’re 20 games behind…… the only thing to do is to try to win the game you’re playing(and leading) and its foolish to worry about what MIGHT happen in tomorrows game.
As others have mentioned, cutting bait with Glavine, demoting Schafer, and trading Frenchy were the sort of proactive roster moves that have to take place, and it’s very gratifying to see him doing them.
The Vazquez and McLouth trades have been great so far; the Kawakami and Lowe signings are a bit harder to project, but I’m still optimistic about both. The handling of Tommy Hanson’s promotion was exactly as I had hoped.
This isn’t a great team. But Wren hasn’t sat on his ass. He’s making us incrementally better. I didn’t like the Minor draft pick, but I liked last year’s draft a lot, and I generally feel pretty good about the farm system and have hopes for the 2010 major league roster.
Just look at it this way: Dayton Moore traded for Betancourt. Wren traded away Francoeur. Clearly, we got the better Schuerholz disciple.
Johnny
on July 17, 2009 at 4:34 pm
#22 Good stuff Alex. I agree. Wren is turning out to be pretty good. Hell the Church trade alone should make 2009 an A.
This team is flawed for sure but with just a little luck I think we can get into the playoffs. The best part of it is that the core is solid and something to build around.
sansho1
on July 17, 2009 at 4:47 pm
I’m pretty bullish on our chances now, too. This is, for the National League anyway, a playoff-caliber roster. If we can avoid serious injury, and if KJ can either come back and make a contribution, or net us some fresh ‘pen meat, we’ve got a real shot.
FlaBravesFan
on July 17, 2009 at 4:51 pm
Rosenthal is calling us a dark horse contender in his latest column….but then again, he picked us to win the WS last year
Robert
on July 17, 2009 at 5:02 pm
As others have mentioned, cutting bait with Glavine, demoting Schafer, and trading Frenchy were the sort of proactive roster moves that have to take place, and it’s very gratifying to see him doing them.
Trading Frenchy was proactive? In what sense? We were the longest running joke in the game for running him out there every day. Wren threw away 324 PAs and half the season proving what everyone already knew – Frenchy sucks.
I’m also going to go out on a limb and say that demoting the rookie with a broken wrist who was on a pace to break the single season K mark by August is a move most GMs would probably make.
Some of the trades have worked out though. So there’s that.
Robert, you talk about them like they’re no-brainers, but honestly, the fact is that it’s easy to imagine those things not happening.
I’m not trying to give him a medal. But a significant part of a GM’s job is getting the no-brainers right.
In the last few days, Omar Minaya and Dayton Moore both took steps backward with their team. We took a step forward. That’s a distinction and a difference.
sansho1
on July 17, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Trading Frenchy was not a no-brainer — in fact, is was a massive brainer. One of the biggest brainers I’ve ever seen. Because he found a taker.
Robert
on July 17, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Robert, honestly, you talk about them like they’re no-brainers, but the fact is that it’s easy to imagine those things not happening.
Really? Schafer was hitting .204/.313/.287 and striking out in a third of his PAs. Are there similar guys around the league that are keeping their jobs because their GMs aren’t as proactive? I don’t think so. And of course I refuse to give anyone involved in any way with the Frenchy fiasco any genius points.
In the last few days, Omar Minaya and Dayton Moore both took steps backward with their team. We took a step forward. That’s a distinction and a difference.
Ok, I’ll grant that Wren hasn’t recently traded for any out-tastic sinkholes. Fair enough.
Hanan
on July 17, 2009 at 5:35 pm
Acquiring a warm body, much less a competent major league player, is a pretty big feather in Wren’s cap.
I think overall he’s done a pretty good job given there were so many holes on this team this past offseason, and no one can fill all of them at one time without a lot of money, sacrificing prospects or both. There just aren’t good players out there growing on trees for him to pluck off. Besides, he tried to sign several players last offseason that simply took other deals. It’s a balancing act, and the idea is to be competitive for a long time. I think Wren is certainly keeping that in mind and addressing the weaknesses as best he can.
oldtimer?
on July 17, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Another issue is that we have no idea how long we have been trying to trade away Jeffy.
It could have been months of trying to dump him and as long as he was on the roster, Bobby was going to play him. Same as Schafer, he was here, Bobby was going to play him.
I think Wren has done a great job overall of making us a better team now and in the future and not stepping all over his manager in the process.
Ethan
on July 17, 2009 at 5:46 pm
@29
Schafer’s a rookie. I didn’t think it was unreasonable to give him an adjustment period and honestly, the only reason he was up as long as he was was that the only replacement, Blanco, was doing just as poorly at the AAA level.
The only real issue that I have with Wren was signing ACHE when he could have had Juan Rivera or Bobby Abreu for a comparable price.
Sansho @24,
I kind of agree. There’re still a lot of if’s, but I beginning to think that they might be in it till the end
If he hasn’t commented, I wouldn’t know. I don’t track IP addresses that closely.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 6:31 pm
how long are we delayed?
Adam M
on July 17, 2009 at 6:37 pm
I’m with Robert on the Francoeur and Schafer moves: nobody deserves credit for doing their jobs, not even in MLB. That said, I loved both the Vazquez and McLouth deals, and the simple fact that Wren has resisted trading blue chippers while adding affordable talent under contract makes me like him a lot more. I don’t feel that dread I did before the year started–when Francoeur was penciled in as an important piece of the roster and Anderson signed as the starting LF.
Yes, it’s the home park that’s the problem, that’s why Wright has hit more homers there than on the road. I think that the crew may hate Chip as much as we do.
Frank
on July 17, 2009 at 6:55 pm
@41–cruelty to children
Kudos to Maddux–thanks for the memories Greg.
mraver
on July 17, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Getting a useful player for Frenchy was a coup. If you want to argue that Frenchy had no business being even a part-time player (which I would), you should be extremely impressed that Wren was able to get a useful platoon player for him.
You can also argue that Frenchy shouldn’t have been given as much leash as he was (which I would also do), but that goes on Cox as much as anything.
How was that even close at the plate with the runners going?
Ethan
on July 17, 2009 at 7:07 pm
mraver,
I agree, but I think at least part of the issue with Frenchy was that there were a lot more issues at play than just his (abysmal) on field performance
Tomas
on July 17, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Snitker is sending *everyone* after the all-star break!
CHIP: Nice reception for Jeff Francoeur… and he pops it up on the first pitch.
Seriously, this stuff writes itself.
Frank
on July 17, 2009 at 7:18 pm
Jeffy true to form!
Johnny
on July 17, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Geez guys. The guy is a Met now (thank God) and we’re still ripping him. Lets face it he could be playing for the Bad News Bears and he would still be the official Bete Noir of Braves Journal.
Tomas
on July 17, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Normal outcomes aren’t “breaks”, Joe.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:22 pm
you think JJ is soooo happy to get this shot at Jeffy?
“Heres for all those wins i could have had without your dumbass!!!”
Ethan
on July 17, 2009 at 7:24 pm
Yesco ~ Kotchrocket!
mraver
on July 17, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Honestly, I think the problem is that everyone who has ever met Frenchy says he’s a great guy. Gregarious, funny… just a great guy to be around. And all of the broadcasters/writers have personal relationships with him. So they try to be nice despite his suckiness. When Chip and Joe say things like they said, I don’t think it’s ’cause they honestly believe he’s just getting bad breaks or anything. I mean, it’s not like they can just go on TV and say, “And there’s another first-pitch pop-up by Francouer. What an awful player he is.” It’s just mean.
Not that I don’t think he’s an awful player. I just wouldn’t say it in a public forum if I knew him personally and thought he was a nice guy.
Michael
on July 17, 2009 at 7:26 pm
@61 The ripples from Jeffy’s pebble falling into our pond will be around for quite a while.
Frank
on July 17, 2009 at 7:27 pm
@61–I’m not ripping him. Now that he’s a Met I’m pure praise for his incredible out making proficiency.
Grst
on July 17, 2009 at 7:28 pm
@9 Starting pitchers aren’t just sitting on their thumbs between starts. They toss every day. I think it’s definitely possible to wear a relief pitcher down with over use, but throwing multiple days in a row is not the big deal so many seem to be making it.
Bad outings may be caused by fatigue, but too many people are merely assuming so where, I think, it’s hardly clear that’s the case. For some reason, people don’t seem to accept that pitchers can go through slumps the same way hitters can. But pitching is a complicated mechanical process and its easy to lose your timing just as it is with hitting. It’s not always because somebody is overusing their precious arm.
rehabreject
on July 17, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Francoeur BB + H so far: goose egg
I set the over/under at 3 for the entire series in my make-believe casino yesterday
Starting pitchers don’t throw every day. They throw twice between starts. And there’s a huge difference between throwing on the side and throwing in a game.
I give up. Seriously, nobody since Maddux in his prime has made me just throw up my hands and just accept that he’s terrific. I don’t know how long this will last, but what can you say?
Every time the Braves get a couple of homers, they start throwing at Yunel.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Apparently, Walter Cronkite has died at 92.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:47 pm
i thought he died two years ago…
Tony
on July 17, 2009 at 7:47 pm
He lived a long life…RIP
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:48 pm
atleast we are getting runs from the top of the order like we are supposed to
oldtimer?
on July 17, 2009 at 7:48 pm
pitching multiple days in a row many times in a row is a big issue and Bobby is one of those managers that has always, and obviously will continue, to do so.
2 more HR’s, very nice.
Speaking of Journalism.
Walter Kronkite, 92. R.I.P.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 7:49 pm
oldtimer?
on July 17, 2009 at 7:50 pm
#90, That was Abe Vigoda.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:51 pm
just picture Mad dog pitching to McCann..i bet that would be a beautiful game….
also where does McCann rate amongst the top Braves catchers of all times?
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:51 pm
double post
Tomas
on July 17, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Perfect weak grounder by Jeffrey.
Michael
on July 17, 2009 at 7:58 pm
McCann probably already is the best Braves catcher of all time.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Oh Jeffy – just like old times…seems like only yesterday.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:59 pm
thats their jeffy
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 7:59 pm
@99 agree
kc
on July 17, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Frenchy is the best.
the braves blow here
on July 17, 2009 at 8:03 pm
@ 96
#2 behind Javy Lopez
Johnny
on July 17, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Hey y’all Javy Lopez had some pretty good years as a Brave.
It’s still probably Torre on peak or Javy on career length (and in Javy’s case, postseason performance), with a respectful nod to Del Crandall’s defense. But McCann is closing.
…I thought I already enjoyed beating the Mets as much as any one human being could possibly enjoy any activity. But I have found that, now that The Trojan Horse formerly known as The Groundhog is a Met….errr, a Melt rather, that I am enjoying beating these orange and blue clad douche bags at a level of enjoyment I didn’t realize was possible. Any one with me on this one?
Johnny
on July 17, 2009 at 8:10 pm
The Ground Hog Virus?
Bruce Benedict is a sentimental favorite of mine from the bad old days.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 8:10 pm
@108 i,m very much with you on that…it bring back memories of when frenchy was coming up in the system & i knew two mets fans who owned a baseball card shop in Catersville & they said how lucky we were to have him…well..our gift to you sirs. no return policy in effect
kc
on July 17, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Nice play Church.
All those pitches from Maddux were off the plate. Gotta love that.
spike (back in the ATL)
on July 17, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Jeez – Pelfrey must have PO’ed Manuel at some point. They are really letting him take a kicking.
Parish
on July 17, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Maybe “Andy” really is a 2nd half guy.
Hanan
on July 17, 2009 at 8:20 pm
McCann going for the cycle tonight?
Is Pelfrey out throwing BP? Jeffy could probably get a hit off him tonight. Wait, let’s not get carried away.
Parish
on July 17, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Oh, yeah!
Love ya, Mets.
Tre
on July 17, 2009 at 8:23 pm
ahahahaha this is glorious!!!!!
oldtimer?
on July 17, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Guys like Sheff and Chipper are incredible.
They both can still hit a ton but their bodies are just pushing back.
Usually the bat speed and eyes go before hamstrings and crap like that do.
Tomas
on July 17, 2009 at 8:24 pm
Maddux Night is not Mets night.
Brian J.
on July 17, 2009 at 8:24 pm
Seven extra-base hits. Where has this offense been all season? They can’t be *that* glad to be rid of Frenchy, can they?
Mr. Logan has nice stuff albeit against AAA hitters here.
adiven jack
on July 17, 2009 at 8:56 pm
I think I would have let Jair get the first out in the 7th so he could have finally received the standing ovation he deserves. What a year he’s having.
A 2-hitter through 6 for the 23-year old. The kid just keeps doing his thing. With or without the run support.
It would be nice to retire Glavine and Smoltz’s numbers tonight too.
I was just getting ready to comment in the other thread. Then I hit refresh. Whew! That was a close one. Now, I can’t remember what I was going to say.
From the previous (duh)
AAR, I don’t think I see the relevance of J-school here one way or another. Access is critical for reporting true, but when the price is journalistic integrity and an arm’s length relationship, it has little value. On that score, the profession is almost beyond rehabilitation. Cooper and Miller were the end, not the beginning. Between the Washington Post “Salons” and the coverage of the Iranian uprising being better on Fark than Fox or CNN, combined with Fourniers of the world, there is just no credibility left. I think the unspoken reason why media is suffering these days is that the have lost credibility with the marketplace.
I don’t think you can really judge journalism as a whole by the actions of sportswriters, many of whom really aren’t journalists (although some have moved from sports to hard news and some have done both). It’s pretty clear that many sportswriters are people that just like sports and have some ability to write. The rewards for doing real sxpose journalism in sports isn’t that great. I doubt anyone would choose DOB as their first choice to cover Afghanistan. Let’s face it, many writers covering baseball don’t have the foggiest notion of statistical analysis; I can’t imagine a journalist covering serious news having such a limited understanding of a key part of his or her beat. At the same time, without bashing journalism, anyone that has seen a story written about something with which they are familiar realizes how often journalists get the story wrong.
The Cubs and their fans are here in DC, and I wish it would rain consistently hard for the next 3 days. Nevermind, that means they will just be wandering around the city annoying the hell out of everyone.
I think Bobby views relievers as failed starting pitchers and treats them as such.
But on the other hand an appearance may consist of just one pitch. I dunno Mac, you want a starter to make 30 appearances and pitch somewhere near 200 innings. But over use of a reliever is 50 games even when the guy has thrown just 38 innings? Ok, I reckon. But shouldn’t it be more granular like the number of pitches thrown per appearance or something?
#5 thats the old school thought process.
I’m going to the Cubs-Nats game on Saturday with my daughter. We went to a Cubs game a couple of years ago and she still talks about how much beer the Cubs fan in front of us drank.
Marc –
None of the references in #3 were sportswriters.
But I will extend the analogy a bit – both the sportswriters and the news heavyweights are getting flanked on the analysis side by the blogosphere. Guys like Nate Silver on the politics side are taking the information and doing just as good (better, imho) of translating it into meaning, and it’s even more of a thrashing on the sportswriting side. All the media companies have left to sell IS the stories they get from their privileged access, which is why they will write whatever they need to in order to keep it.
edit – I can’t imagine a journalist covering serious news having such a limited understanding of a key part of his or her beat.
I must have a much richer imagination than most, because I have met and read plenty of “serious” reporters that were pretty limited in their broader understanding of subject.
There is probably a way to roughly calculate the impact of innings v. appearances. However, there are two reasons to think that appearances are probably more important than innings for a reliever. First, as noted, there are warmup pitches, which aren’t measured but certainly strain a pitcher’s arm. Second, if you pitch on back-to-back days, there’s no chance to recover from the first day. Runs like Moylan has had, pitching four days in a row — that can’t be good. In this case, you’re not talking long-term cumulative difficulties, but the possibility of hurting yourself throwing when your arm hasn’t had a chance to heal.
Spike,
You make good points and I can’t really argue (although I don’t agree that the media companies provide no value. But their resources have shrunk to the point where it is harder and harder for them to do a good job.) My point was that sportswriters, I think, are especially egregious and I don’t really consider their job to be journalism.
and Mac @ 9,
Also, “loss of effectiveness” plays in.
Probablly the way to determine maximum bullpen useage before effectiveness loss or breakdown possibility would be to run an analysis of the Red Sox pen for the last 6 years. I bet Bill James and Theo and the gang have it figured pretty damn closely.
I have put it on here before but Jim Leyland has, for many years, kept his relievers’ appearances at no more than the prorated portion of the season represented by 75 divided by 162. That is, they are never on pace for more than 75 appearances. He has been pretty damn successful at it, too.
when do we retire glavin & smoltzie’s jersey’s???
Nick
If gonzo and O’flaherty were available last night, I’d hope cox would have had enough sense to use one of them in the 9th besides soriano. I was saying using Soriano was a mistake because I thought gonzo and o’flaherty were available. Clearly if both of them weren’t then soriano was the right play. But if you sit here and try to say using soriano in that situation (if gonzo and o’flaherty were available) was the right move then I’m sorry but your a fool
I gotta recuse myself from the WaPo salon debate. And anyway, we’re getting close to politics. Obviously, what Nate Silver provides is tremendous value added to the public discourse. I think that investigative journalism is too.
Too many sportswriters feel too comfortable with not asking tough questions, and instead resting on tired cliches like “he’s got a tired arm” or “he’s due.” I don’t think that means that the profession of journalism is pointless, I think it means that it needs to do better.
That having been said, the majority of news stories that you read in the blogosphere or watch on TV are either broken or driven by print reporters, who are capable of providing value-added coverage not just day of, but also day after and many days after that. The broadsheet allows for a much longer attention span for dirt-diggers to talk to people who may not want to talk at first and find new information that isn’t readily available on the surface. Nate Silver crunches data that other people provide, and he crunches it in interesting ways. Journalism involves both finding information and contextualizing it.
There’s a lot of crap, but there’s a lot of good stuff.
@13,
I may be a fool by your lights, but I don’t understand how you can say it was wrong to use the closer in a relatively close game after he had not pitched in four days simply because of the possibility that you might need him the next day.
And is it beyond your ability to avoid calling people names?
I don’t really consider their job to be journalism.
To the extent that you seem to be defining “journalism” as “investigative journalism”, maybe not. But a good sportswriter does practically every other kind of writing that can be found in what we used to call the newspaper, just in a sporting context. Event coverage, courtroom reporting, business, opinion, historical pieces, obits, lifestyle, etc. They’re generalists by trade, and not uncommonly the best writers at any given outlet.
Lineup per DOB:
LINEUP TONIGHT:
1. McLouth
2. Prado
3. Chipper
4. McCann
5. Anderson
6. Escobar
7. Church
8. Kotchman
9. Jurrjens
For Mets, Francoeur hitting fifth, providing — ahem — protection for cleanup hitter Sheff.
@12 After John wins his World Series with the Red Sox, I think he will retire. So his will probably be next summer.
The Sox are offering Lugo along with paying all of his salary but the minimum (the logic being if they release him, they’d have to pay that anyway). He’s a pretty useless player, but he’d be free. I don’t want him now, but a week ago, I’d be hoping that the Braves would trade Francoeur for him.
I still can’t believe Wren got a useful player for that guy.
Anyone ever heard of a manager having a bullpen rotation to correspond with a starting rotation? For instance, every Kawakami start could also be a Medlen “finish” – count on 5-6 innings from KK and 3-4 from Medlen. Have corresponding bullpen “finishers” for every starter, and maybe use your stopper (Soriano) in the most crucial situation of the game, regardless of inning. This gives everyone scheduled rest and prevents the beating of dead horses.
let me get this straight………….Bobby has his closer with four days rest in a save situation against a division rival and he shouldnt use him??…….i think he should have used him no matter who else was available…or maybe we should seal him in a glass box so he’ll be well rested in september when we’re 20 games behind…… the only thing to do is to try to win the game you’re playing(and leading) and its foolish to worry about what MIGHT happen in tomorrows game.
Things we’ve learned this year, part 37:
Frank Wren is actually a pretty good GM.
As others have mentioned, cutting bait with Glavine, demoting Schafer, and trading Frenchy were the sort of proactive roster moves that have to take place, and it’s very gratifying to see him doing them.
The Vazquez and McLouth trades have been great so far; the Kawakami and Lowe signings are a bit harder to project, but I’m still optimistic about both. The handling of Tommy Hanson’s promotion was exactly as I had hoped.
This isn’t a great team. But Wren hasn’t sat on his ass. He’s making us incrementally better. I didn’t like the Minor draft pick, but I liked last year’s draft a lot, and I generally feel pretty good about the farm system and have hopes for the 2010 major league roster.
Just look at it this way: Dayton Moore traded for Betancourt. Wren traded away Francoeur. Clearly, we got the better Schuerholz disciple.
#22 Good stuff Alex. I agree. Wren is turning out to be pretty good. Hell the Church trade alone should make 2009 an A.
This team is flawed for sure but with just a little luck I think we can get into the playoffs. The best part of it is that the core is solid and something to build around.
I’m pretty bullish on our chances now, too. This is, for the National League anyway, a playoff-caliber roster. If we can avoid serious injury, and if KJ can either come back and make a contribution, or net us some fresh ‘pen meat, we’ve got a real shot.
Rosenthal is calling us a dark horse contender in his latest column….but then again, he picked us to win the WS last year
As others have mentioned, cutting bait with Glavine, demoting Schafer, and trading Frenchy were the sort of proactive roster moves that have to take place, and it’s very gratifying to see him doing them.
Trading Frenchy was proactive? In what sense? We were the longest running joke in the game for running him out there every day. Wren threw away 324 PAs and half the season proving what everyone already knew – Frenchy sucks.
I’m also going to go out on a limb and say that demoting the rookie with a broken wrist who was on a pace to break the single season K mark by August is a move most GMs would probably make.
Some of the trades have worked out though. So there’s that.
Robert, you talk about them like they’re no-brainers, but honestly, the fact is that it’s easy to imagine those things not happening.
I’m not trying to give him a medal. But a significant part of a GM’s job is getting the no-brainers right.
In the last few days, Omar Minaya and Dayton Moore both took steps backward with their team. We took a step forward. That’s a distinction and a difference.
Trading Frenchy was not a no-brainer — in fact, is was a massive brainer. One of the biggest brainers I’ve ever seen. Because he found a taker.
Robert, honestly, you talk about them like they’re no-brainers, but the fact is that it’s easy to imagine those things not happening.
Really? Schafer was hitting .204/.313/.287 and striking out in a third of his PAs. Are there similar guys around the league that are keeping their jobs because their GMs aren’t as proactive? I don’t think so. And of course I refuse to give anyone involved in any way with the Frenchy fiasco any genius points.
In the last few days, Omar Minaya and Dayton Moore both took steps backward with their team. We took a step forward. That’s a distinction and a difference.
Ok, I’ll grant that Wren hasn’t recently traded for any out-tastic sinkholes. Fair enough.
Acquiring a warm body, much less a competent major league player, is a pretty big feather in Wren’s cap.
I think overall he’s done a pretty good job given there were so many holes on this team this past offseason, and no one can fill all of them at one time without a lot of money, sacrificing prospects or both. There just aren’t good players out there growing on trees for him to pluck off. Besides, he tried to sign several players last offseason that simply took other deals. It’s a balancing act, and the idea is to be competitive for a long time. I think Wren is certainly keeping that in mind and addressing the weaknesses as best he can.
Another issue is that we have no idea how long we have been trying to trade away Jeffy.
It could have been months of trying to dump him and as long as he was on the roster, Bobby was going to play him. Same as Schafer, he was here, Bobby was going to play him.
I think Wren has done a great job overall of making us a better team now and in the future and not stepping all over his manager in the process.
@29
Schafer’s a rookie. I didn’t think it was unreasonable to give him an adjustment period and honestly, the only reason he was up as long as he was was that the only replacement, Blanco, was doing just as poorly at the AAA level.
The only real issue that I have with Wren was signing ACHE when he could have had Juan Rivera or Bobby Abreu for a comparable price.
Sansho @24,
I kind of agree. There’re still a lot of if’s, but I beginning to think that they might be in it till the end
Hey, has anyone checked to see if Gadfly has shown up on Metsblog yet?
Is he not lurking here, Mac?
If he hasn’t commented, I wouldn’t know. I don’t track IP addresses that closely.
how long are we delayed?
I’m with Robert on the Francoeur and Schafer moves: nobody deserves credit for doing their jobs, not even in MLB. That said, I loved both the Vazquez and McLouth deals, and the simple fact that Wren has resisted trading blue chippers while adding affordable talent under contract makes me like him a lot more. I don’t feel that dread I did before the year started–when Francoeur was penciled in as an important piece of the roster and Anderson signed as the starting LF.
You know, it’s cool. This is just cool.
I’ve had the privilege of watching some great pitchers, but as long as I live, I’ll never see a better pitcher than Greg Maddux.
“Let’s beat the Mets tonight like the old time!”
Gotta love Maddux. I love the fact that we are doing this to the Mets. I know Mets fans hate Maddux like nuts.
AAR, without a doubt. Greg is by far the best.
Maddux at his ceremony: “Let’s go beat the Mets tonight like old times. Hoo Rah”
Lets get a win tonight.
EDIT: kc and AAR, count me as on board with that.
Can you imagine Maddux in his prime facing Jeffy?
thats like Brock Lesner fighting Timmy from southpark
Maddux was a very democratic pitcher. He made everyone look stupid.
Talk about high comedy Mac
@41 Smartest pitcher ever vs dumbest hitter ever.
Yes, it’s the home park that’s the problem, that’s why Wright has hit more homers there than on the road. I think that the crew may hate Chip as much as we do.
@41–cruelty to children
Kudos to Maddux–thanks for the memories Greg.
Getting a useful player for Frenchy was a coup. If you want to argue that Frenchy had no business being even a part-time player (which I would), you should be extremely impressed that Wren was able to get a useful platoon player for him.
You can also argue that Frenchy shouldn’t have been given as much leash as he was (which I would also do), but that goes on Cox as much as anything.
Wow. Prado.
Amazin’ stat about Chipper and the Mets.
Chipper, BTW, just tied Jeffy for the team lead in plate appearances.
How was that even close at the plate with the runners going?
mraver,
I agree, but I think at least part of the issue with Frenchy was that there were a lot more issues at play than just his (abysmal) on field performance
Snitker is sending *everyone* after the all-star break!
🙂
With that at-bat, McCann just showed what separates the men from the boys.
Damn nice pitches to ACHE.
Oh, wait, I forgot about Jeffy’s arm of mass destruction. Nevermind.
Phils up 4-1 as Nolasco continues to destroy my fantasy team.
Damnit
Awesome. I love Jeffrey more than ever.
CHIP: Nice reception for Jeff Francoeur… and he pops it up on the first pitch.
Seriously, this stuff writes itself.
Jeffy true to form!
Geez guys. The guy is a Met now (thank God) and we’re still ripping him. Lets face it he could be playing for the Bad News Bears and he would still be the official Bete Noir of Braves Journal.
Normal outcomes aren’t “breaks”, Joe.
you think JJ is soooo happy to get this shot at Jeffy?
“Heres for all those wins i could have had without your dumbass!!!”
Yesco ~ Kotchrocket!
Honestly, I think the problem is that everyone who has ever met Frenchy says he’s a great guy. Gregarious, funny… just a great guy to be around. And all of the broadcasters/writers have personal relationships with him. So they try to be nice despite his suckiness. When Chip and Joe say things like they said, I don’t think it’s ’cause they honestly believe he’s just getting bad breaks or anything. I mean, it’s not like they can just go on TV and say, “And there’s another first-pitch pop-up by Francouer. What an awful player he is.” It’s just mean.
Not that I don’t think he’s an awful player. I just wouldn’t say it in a public forum if I knew him personally and thought he was a nice guy.
@61 The ripples from Jeffy’s pebble falling into our pond will be around for quite a while.
@61–I’m not ripping him. Now that he’s a Met I’m pure praise for his incredible out making proficiency.
@9 Starting pitchers aren’t just sitting on their thumbs between starts. They toss every day. I think it’s definitely possible to wear a relief pitcher down with over use, but throwing multiple days in a row is not the big deal so many seem to be making it.
Bad outings may be caused by fatigue, but too many people are merely assuming so where, I think, it’s hardly clear that’s the case. For some reason, people don’t seem to accept that pitchers can go through slumps the same way hitters can. But pitching is a complicated mechanical process and its easy to lose your timing just as it is with hitting. It’s not always because somebody is overusing their precious arm.
Francoeur BB + H so far: goose egg
I set the over/under at 3 for the entire series in my make-believe casino yesterday
edit: I meant to say BB + H for the entire series
Starting pitchers don’t throw every day. They throw twice between starts. And there’s a huge difference between throwing on the side and throwing in a game.
I’m not exactly sure when I started to fall in love with Prado, but I absolutely love this kid.
Marvelous Martin Prado!
Kelly who?
edit–I also like how Prado’s hitting but he seems much better defensively at teh corners than up the middle.
YES!
Nitram again, again.
I give up. Seriously, nobody since Maddux in his prime has made me just throw up my hands and just accept that he’s terrific. I don’t know how long this will last, but what can you say?
Prado!
8)
I believe that just put his OBP for the season over .400 and his SLG over .500.
wonder when the rest of the NL will take Nitram seriously
Ummmm would that be considered a Prado?
To give you some idea, the NL player with the slash stats closest to Prado is probably Ryan Braun.
Francoeur sucks.
McCann…..
BMac showing his former roomie how it’s done!!!
Catch that Frenchy …
Pimpbot!!!
B-MAC!
Melts, LOL
I hope they replay that Maddux tape in the locker room before every Met game.
how long will Pelfrey will stay in
Every time the Braves get a couple of homers, they start throwing at Yunel.
Apparently, Walter Cronkite has died at 92.
i thought he died two years ago…
He lived a long life…RIP
atleast we are getting runs from the top of the order like we are supposed to
pitching multiple days in a row many times in a row is a big issue and Bobby is one of those managers that has always, and obviously will continue, to do so.
2 more HR’s, very nice.
Speaking of Journalism.
Walter Kronkite, 92. R.I.P.
#90, That was Abe Vigoda.
just picture Mad dog pitching to McCann..i bet that would be a beautiful game….
also where does McCann rate amongst the top Braves catchers of all times?
double post
Perfect weak grounder by Jeffrey.
McCann probably already is the best Braves catcher of all time.
Oh Jeffy – just like old times…seems like only yesterday.
thats their jeffy
@99 agree
Frenchy is the best.
@ 96
#2 behind Javy Lopez
Hey y’all Javy Lopez had some pretty good years as a Brave.
It’s still probably Torre on peak or Javy on career length (and in Javy’s case, postseason performance), with a respectful nod to Del Crandall’s defense. But McCann is closing.
Crandall
1305 gms
Lopez
1106 gms
Benedict
971 gms
Masi
840 gms
Torre
796 gms
McCann’s at 544.
Man, I must say, I didn’t think it was possible…
…I thought I already enjoyed beating the Mets as much as any one human being could possibly enjoy any activity. But I have found that, now that The Trojan Horse formerly known as The Groundhog is a Met….errr, a Melt rather, that I am enjoying beating these orange and blue clad douche bags at a level of enjoyment I didn’t realize was possible. Any one with me on this one?
The Ground Hog Virus?
Bruce Benedict is a sentimental favorite of mine from the bad old days.
@108 i,m very much with you on that…it bring back memories of when frenchy was coming up in the system & i knew two mets fans who owned a baseball card shop in Catersville & they said how lucky we were to have him…well..our gift to you sirs. no return policy in effect
Nice play Church.
All those pitches from Maddux were off the plate. Gotta love that.
Church made a play that Jeff turns into a double, if not a triple.
WOW…they got Prado out. I’m shock….
the melts really have given up..Plefrey is over a 100 pitches & is still in as far as i can tell…damn gamecast
Chip just said Don Sutton has a hall of fame resume. He’s already in the hall Chip. Slow down and think before you speak…geez
Anybody catch earlier that Maddux and Glavine were the number 31 and number 47 picks, respectively in the same draft?
I am sure that their numbers are no coincidence as Joe and Chip were implying.
Mac is a triple away from completing a cycle!
And Childress is as dumb as Frenchy.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AvZgIq2gdfzZMXO9TXeOLzC8vLYF?slug=ap-hawks-childress&prov=ap&type=lgns
Jeez – Pelfrey must have PO’ed Manuel at some point. They are really letting him take a kicking.
Maybe “Andy” really is a 2nd half guy.
McCann going for the cycle tonight?
Is Pelfrey out throwing BP? Jeffy could probably get a hit off him tonight. Wait, let’s not get carried away.
Oh, yeah!
Love ya, Mets.
ahahahaha this is glorious!!!!!
Guys like Sheff and Chipper are incredible.
They both can still hit a ton but their bodies are just pushing back.
Usually the bat speed and eyes go before hamstrings and crap like that do.
Maddux Night is not Mets night.
Seven extra-base hits. Where has this offense been all season? They can’t be *that* glad to be rid of Frenchy, can they?
It’s 2009, Chip. Don’t worry, it’s only July, you’ll catch up eventually.
@125 i would be
OK Ryan, time for a hit dude.
Chip just gave a eulogy for Sheff’s 2009 season.
What happened to Sheff?
I did not see.
its only the 5th hhahaha
Probably a pulled or more likely a strained hamstring.
C’mon Kotch. Just get the runner home from 3rd.
Am I being greedy?
there is no greedy when its comes to the melts or the phils
9 game hitting streak for Kotchman?
Thats what the Met announcers just said.
NO MERCY RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yikes! We’re kicking their asses.
Parish this is Greg Maddux day and its the dang Mets. I hope we score 2 more touchdowns and go for the two pointer.
Season high for runs: 12 against Colorado on May 20.
i feel like there is alot of pent up aggresion being let out on the melts tonight
Now this is a game to gripe about using Soriano.
Yeah, a lot of teams had the bad luck to have Joe Simpson as one of their outfielders.
Kotchman is having the worst nine-game hit streak in baseball history. For his last seven games, he’s had one hit in each.
Does this mean we get to see Frenchy hitting cleanup tomorrow?
140 – The question is: how long do you stick with Jurrjens?
I suppose as long as possible, but a some point it is wise to give his young arm a rest.
@144 I think it’s more urgent to get Chipper, McCann, and Yunel out of the game.
Oh man, no triple for Mac…
Omg don’t hit it to right McCann!!!!11one! lol @ Chip
With 85 pitches through 6?
Probably go 7 and then hopefully a Luis Valdez sighting
I think I would have gone for one more inning with Jair.
So would I. But why deny Boone the fun of facing Jeff?
Edit: 0-7. Nothing hit outside the infield. Yep, Omar Minaya’s a genius.
rest his arm, its a long second half, if our bullpen cant hold a 10 run lead, we really do suck
None of the Mets currently in the game has a hit.
Logon is looking pretty good.
Mr. Logan has nice stuff albeit against AAA hitters here.
I think I would have let Jair get the first out in the 7th so he could have finally received the standing ovation he deserves. What a year he’s having.
A 2-hitter through 6 for the 23-year old. The kid just keeps doing his thing. With or without the run support.
I think Castillo has more career hits than the rest of the current Mets lineup combined.
To quote Skip Caray, “Boy, this is fun!”
Kotchdrive!
I believe it was Paul Bryant who counseled,
“When ya got ’em down, kick ’em.”
ok, bobby is taking out Chipper and McCann. I have nothing to complain about.
Poor Medlen. Are we going to see him in the ninth?
He should probably pull Yunel too.
I want Valdez
Conrad is really a poor second baseman. Real issues on DP turn.
EDIT: Return of the ocelots, Mac?
I love watching Medlen, he looks like a 15 year old on a sugar high.
Some days I really love this game.
I’m a bit late with this, but here’s the Mets 2009 in a nutshell:
Now pitching, Elmer Dessens.
A two-hit shut-out on Maddux Night, how very fitting.
I was kinda hoping Reed would reach, so we could get Frenchy to end it.
Ah well, there’s nothing to complain about today. Now, tomorrow let’s leave .500 behind.
I guess Medlen, Valdez, and logan can pitch after all.
Recapped.