His return to the starting rotation exceeded all expectations. He threw 229 2/3 innings (fifth in the league) with a 3.06 ERA (eighth). He went 14-7 and if not for Kolb would have won at least sixteen games. He kept the Braves afloat for most of the spring, when after the injuries to Hampton, Thomson, and Hudson the rest of the rotation was Ramirez, Relievers, and Rookies. Though he noticeably tired down the stretch and was rested after the division was in hand, he came back for a valiant start in the division series, getting the Braves’ only win against the Astros.

Smoltz’s strikeout rate was down not only compared to his relief work but to his normal starting rate as well. At the same time, his control was still good. He had only one double-digit strikeout game, a loss against the Mets in his second start of the year. Some games, he didn’t seem to have his best stuff, or didn’t have one pitch, but he did a great job pitching around the lack.

Going forward, you’d like to see him not have to work so hard so he would have more left for a stretch run. At the same time, do you want to tell him that? 177 wins, so 200 is probably out for this season but should be doable for 2007. 70 2/3 IP from 3000… Sim Scores say that his most-similar pitcher through Age 38 is Hershiser, followed by Schilling and Phil Niekro, but nobody’s really “similar”. Eckersley, of course, is the main comp because he’s the only guy to be a top starter and top reliever for multiple seasons, but Smoltz’s starting career is a lot better than Eck’s and his relief career not nearly as long. I tend to think Smoltz is a Hall of Famer.

John Smoltz Statistics – Baseball-Reference.com