In the New Historical Abstract, Bill James rates Dale Murphy as the twelfth-best centerfielder of all time. Nine of the men ahead of him are in the Hall of Fame; a tenth, Junior Griffey, will certainly be in. The eleventh is Jimmy Wynn.

Jimmy Wynn Statistics – Baseball-Reference.com

Jimmy Wynn, in 1969, the year of Ball Four, though I don’t remember him being mentioned there, hit .269/.436/.507. This was in one of the most extremely poor offensive environments since 1920; the league average adjusted to the Astrodome that year was .257/.327/.381. You just couldn’t hit for power there. As it was, Wynn’s OPS+ that year was 167 and he created 110 runs. It’s a pretty remarkable performance. The season before, he was almost as good, with a 157 OPS+, in a place where the league-average OBP (in the Year of the Pitcher) was .308. Wynn lost a huge number of runs to his park.

How good was Jimmy Wynn? Well, Joe Morgan was a teammate of his from 1963-71; the Astros came up with Wynn and Morgan that season, their second, as well as Rusty Staub, in what must be one of the best one-team rookie classes ever.

Joe Morgan:

AGE G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG SLG OBA OPS
891 3268 531 860 136 58 61 278 585 368 195 58 .263 .396 .375 .771

Jimmy Wynn:

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG SLG OBA OPS
1142 4040 622 1037 185 24 179 574 653 887 149 59 .257 .447 .360 .807

League averages:

AGE G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG SLG OBA OPS
4068 494 1056 162 32 94 458 372 629 58 36 .260 .385 .324 .709

Morgan created 550 runs in 3920 PA; Wynn 686 in 4780. Wynn wasn’t just a more productive hitter in those seasons, he was a significantly more productive hitter (though Morgan was two years younger, so we’re comparing ages 21-29 to ages 19-27). Morgan got out of the Astrodome in 1972 and was freed to be the best player in baseball. Wynn, however, got stuck there for two more years, plus age difference, and when he got out he went to the Dodgers, which wasn’t much better. He was 34 when he finally got to play in a good offensive environment with the Braves, and was pretty much done.

Wynn’s career OPS+ was 128, better than Murphy’s or any of these guys I’ve been talking about but Rice, and he was a far more valuable defensive player than Rice. But his offensive numbers simply aren’t to Hall of Fame standards for an outfielder, and it’s hard to get them there no matter what adjustments you make. He hit 291 career homers, but must have lost 30 or 40 homers to his parks. He had just 1665 career hits and wouldn’t have been a batting champ in any situation; his career batting average was actually below the league. His on-base percentages are great, because he drew so many walks, but the writers don’t care about that. He had only two 100 RBI seasons, and led the league in only one positive offensive category — walks, twice.

I think that Wynn is a Hall of Fame caliber player. Convincing the voters that he’s a Hall of Fame caliber player, that’s another matter. In some ways, he resembles my perennial favorite Darrell Evans, but without the career durability and early- and late-career friendly parks that brought him up to over 400 homers. (Evans’ career line was .248/.361/.431. Wynn’s was .250/.366/.436 — but with more than 2000 fewer plate appearances.) Evans essentially doesn’t have a Hall of Fame campaign even though, like Wynn, he was one of the ten best players ever at his position. And two of Evans’ best seasons were at 36 and 38; Wynn retired at 35.

Wynn might have been a better player than Dale Murphy. He isn’t a better Hall of Fame candidate.