I’ll start here: I didn’t think I’d get to write it this way. I was frustrated and critical of Brian Snitker all year, and especially frustrated by his wavering at the end of the season over whether at all to announce his retirement. I was afraid he’d want to stay too long and the team would just go with it, and I aired those fears over and over.
Instead, the team announced he’d be moving upstairs – announced it in such a way that it wasn’t immediately clear just whose idea it was, honestly, but I’ll leave that to one side – and I’m doubly happy: happy to get to celebrate Snitker’s legacy for what it was, and happy that we’ll be able to get a clean start next year.
Brian Snitker will turn 70 in a little over a week, and he’s spent a half-century with the Braves organization.
Back then
He grew up in the other Macon – the one that’s in Illinois outside of the other Decatur, due south of the Dekalb they pronounce wrong – where his high school had something of a Hoosiers story that got written up in a book called One Shot at Forever that I’ve bought but haven’t read yet. From high school, he went to junior college, then to the University of New Orleans; his nearest team, the Cubs, drafted him in the 25th round, but he decided to stay in school for his senior year. After graduation, the Braves brought him in as an undrafted senior sign in 1977. They’re the only employer he’s ever had.
He was a catcher, of course, like so many future managers. I don’t quite understand the way they handled him as a prospect in the minors – after spending the rest of 1977 in rookie ball, they jumped him three levels in 1978. My suspicion is that they viewed him as an org player and just moved him around wherever they needed an extra catcher’s glove. He never hit very much, but the team clearly saw something in him, as they sent Henry Aaron to break the news to Snitker that while he was finished as a player, they wanted to keep him as a coach.
Coach
Aaron was only a couple of years removed from his own playing career, shortly into a front office career with the Braves that would be extraordinary in its own right. Two of his proteges were among the more successful managers of their era: two-time world champion Cito Gaston, and potential future Hall of Famer Dusty Baker. Brian can hold his head high among that company.
After getting the message from Aaron, Snitker spent the next several decades bouncing between minor league levels with occasional stints in the big league clubhouse: from 1982-87, for example, he managed in Single-A, except for 1985, when he came up to be the big league bullpen coach, a position to which he returned from 1988 to the beginning of 1990.
He spent a few years as a minor league coach then returned to managing, which he did for a decade from the mid-’90s to the mid-2000s, when he was once again called up to the bigs to be Bobby Cox’s third base coach, a position for which he became pretty unpopular around here: he so frequently seemed to wave men to get thrown out at home that Mac added a Glossary entry for baserunners getting “Snitker’d.”
In 20 seasons as a minor league manager between 1982 and 2016, Brian Snitker had an overall record of 1347-1367, personally managing most of the key Braves prospects over that period, from Ron Gant, Jeff Blauser, and Mark Lemke, to the Baby Braves, to Jason Heyward and Freddie Freeman.
Skipper
Then finally, finally, Fredi Gonzalez richly earned a midseason firing with a 9-28 start to the 2016 campaign, and the 60-year-old Snitker got his first big league managing job. Over his decade in the manager’s chair, he distinguished himself remarkably: a 811-668 record, 143 games over .500, fourth among active managers, and a .548 winning percentage that’s fifth among active managers with at least 500 games managed. With 24 postseason games won, he’s sixth among active managers.
In his ten seasons, he won one Manager of the Year award (2018), and also finished third an additional three times, and finished fourth twice. He may have been a late bloomer, but from the moment he took charge, he was immediately recognized as being among the best of his peers. He’ll always be compared to Bobby Cox, his mentor, and that’s not an easy comparison for anyone, but he’s easily the second-best manager we’ve ever had.
His best skill, for quite a while, was his ability to get the players to all pull together, stars and fill-ins, veterans and rookies, healthy and injured, all believing in the next man up. Because he’d managed so damn many of them in the minors, he’d known them man and boy and they loved him, truly wanted to run through a wall for him. He had the steady even keel the Braves have prized for decades, but he inspired a passion in his men that Fredi Gonzalez simply never could.
Brian and Bobby
An underrated skill of his, though, I’ve always felt, was his hook. Bobby was a players’ manager, known for writing his players into their roles with a Sharpie pen and for sticking with his starters to ride through the lumps. Snit was famous for sticking with Will Smith through a terrible few months in 2021, and his faith paid off brilliantly in the 2021 postseason. But generally, to my eyes, he often had a much quicker (and saner) hook than Bobby, particularly in the playoffs.
One of Bobby’s favorite moves was the double switch, a strategy mostly outmoded by the designated hitter. Snitker’s variation on the theme was the late-inning replacement, frequently rotating through the extra outfielders on the rosters that Alex Anthopoulos assembled for him.
On the other hand, Bobby routinely platooned his players – frankly, he did it to a fault, as he wasted quite a bit of Ryan Klesko’s potential value and gave thousands of worthless at-bats to Keith Lockhart – while Snit presided over a clubhouse that emphasized playing every single day, with Freddie Freeman and Dansby Swanson as the moral enforcers of the unofficial policy. I tend to think that this exacerbated a lot of players’ nagging injuries and contributed to the injury-driven roster breakdown in 2024 and 2025.
A few years ago, baseball-reference introduced stats to track managerial tendencies, so we can track Snitker’s style against that of his peers. In general, Snit’s teams stole bases somewhat less than average, but he used pinch runners more than average; clearly, he didn’t want to give away outs on the bases, but he also was eager to get a speed advantage in late innings. His teams sacrifice bunted much less than average – again, an unwillingness to give away outs – but he also used pinch hitters somewhat less than average. And he used a precisely league-average number of pitchers. He won a little over half of his managerial challenges. He sure didn’t get ejected much, but the former is a lot more important than the latter.
The modern game
In general, for a baseball lifer who bounced around leagues and roles as much as he did, I think Snitker was an old-school guy who displayed a lot greater flexibility than he regularly got credit for. Baseball has changed a lot over the past few years.
(One example was posted by Baseball-America’s JJ Cooper last night on Bluesky:
We just finished the 4th inning of tonight’s Cubs-Brewers game. This game has had 35 100 mph pitches. That’s more than were thrown in the ’08, ’09 or ’10 postseasons.
From pitch clocks and ghost runners to spin rates and launch angle and to torpedo bats and oversized bases, the game looks a lot different than it did in Bobby’s day. (Bobby was an innovator, too – he and Tony La Russa more or less invented modern bullpen specialization – but Snitker arguably had to contend with an even greater pace of change.)
Not very long ago, there was a cartoonish culture clash, illustrated by the blog Fire Joe Morgan and the movie Moneyball, between crotchety veterans who couldn’t abide any particular kind of change in the game and still believed that doing the little things is what won championships, and you can still hear a version of that get-off-my-lawn philosophy in John Smoltz’s color commentary. Brian Snitker simply was not that kind of alter kacker.
Quo vadis
The Braves are going to embark upon a managerial search for the first time in a very, very long time; Fredi Gonzalez and Brian Snitker were both promoted from within and specifically selected for their abilities to be successors to Bobby Cox. It’s long past time for the Braves to look beyond their own organization to ensure that they’re able to broaden their perspective.
The last time they conducted a full external search, they landed with general manager Alex Anthopoulos, and while I’ve criticized him a bit more lately, he has inarguably been a wildly successful choice. I was over the moon at the time, and I could hope for no better outcome than a managerial candidate who is as good as AA has been in the front office. The Braves are not quite at a crossroads, but the team has been spinning its wheels for a couple of summers, as much of the current core has played beneath their career norms, while players like Orlando Arcia, Jarred Kelenic, and Michael Harris II have comprehensively failed to make any offensive progress in the past two years, to the point that the first two are no longer in the organization.
The most important thing the next manager will do is hire a coaching staff around him. At his best, Snitker had a rare gift for bringing out the best in his players and inspiring them to reach the peak of their potential, and that is what I hope his successor will be able to do.
But for now, he rides off into the sunset after five decades of service to the franchise, during which time he has meaningfully contributed to essentially every good moment we’ve enjoyed since the team left Milwaukee.
How would I sum up Snitker’s career? I’d do it with his favorite expression.
“Really good.”

Great stuff, AAR.
The last time they conducted a true full external search for a manager, they hired Chuck Tanner. The good news is that that was almost 40 years ago and someone has probably learned something in the interim.
I will only remember Snitker for the winning. He was a stand up guy. I enjoyed watching him argue and get tossed; I only wish he had done it more. Melting down over Olson’s stupid interference call when the season was hopeless will be one of my fondest memories. But most of all I will remember his World Series winning speech. You could tell he truly loved it for the players. He was a good manager, and if the team didn’t implode we may not have noticed as much that he didn’t seem to be as attentive this season. He won’t be so easy to replace. I hope we actually make an effort toward that because you can do a lot worse very easily.
Proper perspective on Snit… can’t say I disagree… his reaction to the early-season Acuna/Kelenic kerfluffle left me (and many others) more than a little confused… this year, there were way too many hills to climb… but, a terrific legacy and a flag that’ll always fly.
Ah yes, Chuck Tanner…. the runoff from the Eddie Haas Experiment.
Tanner certainly inherited a club that would never be confused with that bunch he had in Pittsburgh… or Chicago… or Oakland. Too many players like Ken Oberkfell, Omar Moreno & Andres Thomas… & certainly not enough pitching.
As an aside, isn’t it a little stunning that Andres Thomas was our starting SS for so long?
This year, to me, it was clear that he’d lost his fastball. Not that he checked out, but his energy level certainly did not appear to be what would have been required to manage through the challenges of the year. After the Kelenic/Acuña incident, I essentially became convinced that he had to go, and nothing that happened the rest of the year changed my mind.
But, he’s about to turn 70. That’s when Connie Mack lost his effectiveness, too. Bobby also retired after turning 69, as a matter of fact. Bruce Bochy’s 70, and he just got fired. The man who’s won the third-most championships of all time!
I’m sorry that Brian couldn’t have announced his farewell sooner, so we could have said goodbye to him in September. As with so many moments this year, his reaction time was just a bit slow. But he made the right decision in the end, and we can celebrate all his highlights without feeling too morose about the fact that he didn’t get to go out on a high.
It may well be that the next manager will do a better job next season than 70-year-old Snit would have. On the other hand, someday that manager will almost undoubtedly be fired. Snit will be missed.
Nope. David Ross will gracefully retire after 10 world championships in 20 seasons. I won’t be greedy. He will lose his share.
Your offer is acceptable.
Excellent write up on Snitker – thank! I know he was criticized at times for being too old school, but as you point out, he listened to others. I liked the way he managed in the playoffs – from roster selection, to yanking starting pitchers, to pinch hitting in unexpected but appropriate situations. We may have more world series championships if this would have been done in previous years.
What, you mean including 3 light-hitting catchers on the postseason roster and sticking with Maddux until he’d coughed up the lead to the Yankees in the 8th wasn’t optimal game management?
What really killed the Braves in that ’99 WS game was that Brian Hunter, a defensive replacement at 1B for Klesko, flubbed a bunt in that inning that left the bases loaded with no outs.
Also, we only got one hit all night.
We get it, Smoltzie. Contact is important in the playoffs. Please stop saying it.
Look, somebody had to take up the traditionalist mantle for Joe Morgan. May as well be Smoltzie.
Fantastic piece, AAR. Here’s to getting a manager as good as AA.
“Alter Kacker” – nice one.
I will always love him for his video message to me on my 50th birthday.
Whoa… Phils… that’s one tough finish.
Just a routine walkoff E1.
That was positively Bravesian. Woof.
Orion, you have company:
For those interested, of the 169 games in MLB history that ended on an E1, the following were postseason games:
Game 3 of the 1914 World Series: The Miracle Braves won the third game in the bottom of the 12th when the Athletics’ Bullet Joe Bush made a bad throw to third on a bunt by Herbie Moran scoring pinch runner Les Mann in the bottom of the 12th, giving the Braves a 3-0 lead. They won the next day.
Game 4 of the 1969 World Series: The Mets won game 4 when Pete Richert threw wild to first on a J.C. Martin bunt in the bottom of the 10th scoring pinch runner Rod Gaspar from second base. The Mets would win the World Series the next day.
Game 3 of the 2014 NLCS: Giant Gregor Blanco bunted in the bottom of the 10th off Cardinal Rany Choate, whose wild throw to first scored Brandon Crawford from second base.
This is the first time a team was eliminated on an E1.
Hate to say it, but… a bit Buckner-ish…
It’s really more Bullet Joe Bush-ish. See above.
Phillies are at an interesting juncture. They’ll have to pay Schwarber big to keep him. Castellanos seems to have worn out his welcome. Suarez, Realmuto are free agents. Wheeler’s future is uncertain with the thoracic outlet syndrome. For all the noise they’ve made over the last four years, they’ve been unable to win it all.
If Kerkering can’t stand the boo birds, the Braves will take him off Philly’s hands, though I’d rather have Schwarber.
This group of Phils will always regret blowing that NLCS to Arizona in ’23.
They’ll still be pretty good next year, but yep, they’ll look a bit different.
This year they spent over $200M on 8 players.
I will take Schwarber but I think he will be too costly. I think you can get Gleyber Torres for much less and have more positional flexibility. From the Phils, I’d rather have Suarez. I think he will pitch effectively for a long time, and you’ll win a couple more games per season just for not having to face him.
Schwarber’s a great hitter, but he strikes out 200 times a year already and he’ll be 33 in March. I’d still feel more comfortable spending money on a position player.
Schwarber is hitting home runs at such a prodigious rate that he’s a darkhorse candidate for 500 home runs and what would become a very interesting Hall of Fame case (would he be the worst member of the 500 club?). But to your point, Alex, about the strikeouts, if his bat slows down even one bit, he’s cooked as a player and immediately useless. The walks will also reduce if he’s less feared as a home run threat.
I’m interested to follow his career to see if he can make it to 500 home runs, but I’d prefer it to be on another team.
Oh… I didn’t realize you had to pay for him. Then, never mind.
You silly goose JonathanF. The point is you can pay the same for a position player and not have a bat only guy. Will not be surprised if Schwarber gets $120MM/4.
I’ve been digesting the Snitker career summaries, and I think my opinion has remained unchanged:
Snit and AA both are good but not great members of their respective roles who inherited an absolutely loaded farm system left by Coppy.
Take the 2021 World Series team. That core was absolutely loaded and diiiiiirt cheap. Freddie, Ozzie, Dansby, Riley, Acuna, Fried, and Ian Anderson were such a loaded, cheap core that it allowed Snit to look like a genius and AA to just take on payroll to fill the remaining holes. Snit definitely pushed the right buttons with that loaded bullpen, but the bullpen was there because AA could just simply acquire guys for nothing because he had so much payroll room created by the cheap core.
Since then, Snit and AA have continued to look less and less like geniuses because the core had gotten expensive, graduated out, and nothing has backfilled it (to be fair, largely due to draft position and sanctions caused by Coppy). But the core being built by Coppy is what made Snit look like a genius until it wasn’t there anymore. And if Snit never won the 2021 WS, his legacy would look a lot more pedestrian.
New Post: