In 2024, Alex Anthopoulos reunited the team with a lot of spare parts from years past. Ryan already covered the most noteworthy offensive retread, Jorge Soler, in a previous post. The remainder can be dispensed in one fell swoop. (Well, except for Jesse Chavez, who’s really in his own category.)
In fact, AA brought back so many of our old friends that you probably forgot about a few of them! Here’s the list, by my count: Chavez and Soler, plus Adam Duvall, Luke Jackson, Eddie Rosario, Chadwick Tromp, and Luke Williams.
That’s a whole lot of not very much.
Hitters
The hitters were horrible. In all, they combined for 702 plate appearances with 23 homers, 73 RBI, a 196:53 strikeout to walk ratio, and a .200/.269/.358 batting line.
And here’s what the collective production looks like when you exclude Jorge Soler: 520 PA, 14 HR, 49 RBI, 152 K:29 BB, .186/.239/.315.
That’s what happens when your backup outfielders hit like backup catchers, and it illustrates how expensive cheap players ultimately can be.
I’m lumping all these guys together because they well all much of a muchness, but truthfully, most of them were just bit actors; among them, Duvall and Soler were the only guys who more than 60 PA, and Soler hit but couldn’t field, and Duvall really couldn’t do either, as he was worth -1.0 WAR on the season. (Extraordinarily, Rosario was worth -0.7 WAR in just 84 PA.)
Other than Ramon Laureano, who I wrote up recently, our team’s best offensive pickups were Gio Urshela and Whit Merrifield, who each were worth 0.8 WAR in around 130-160 PA apiece. The trouble is that Duvall got over 300 PA, and the collective failures of the likes of him and Rosario nullified a lot of the positive work contributed by the newcomers.
To be clear, again, this really isn’t meant as a particular dis of someone like Chadwick Tromp, who made just a cameo on the season. He wasn’t the problem, he wasn’t the solution, he was just a known quantity who was the 25th man on the roster for a few weeks. His numbers don’t contribute much to the aggregate. But he fits as part of the overall story.
(A final aside: there was one more retread, Eli White, who I’m ignoring because he was already on the team by the end of the 2023 season. We originally purchased his contract in January 2023, then released him that July, and re-signed him a few days later. He’s mostly been an org player at Triple-A since then, but in his cup of coffee in 2024 he had a .769 OPS in 42 PA. He wasn’t the problem, either.)
Pitchers
On the face of it, Uncle Jesse gave us one last good season while Luke Jackson was unable to recapture the magic. If you split up the season a bit more finely, Jesse hugely outperformed his peripherals to a microscopic ERA through the end of June, and then he started giving up runs in bunches for the last few months, while Luke underperformed his components for the two months he pitched for us, getting most of his work in garbage time.
He posted a 4.50 ERA in 18 innings for us; his 3.72 FIP suggests he wasn’t as bad as his ERA suggests, but he wasn’t that much better, either.
Ultimately, he was relatively easy to hide because our pitching staff overall was performing highly effectively; it was harder to hide the hitters because our lineup was struggling so badly amid a cataclysm of injuries.
The upshot
Alex Anthopoulos chose not to spend major capital retooling the roster on the fly. While Jorge Soler’s salary was not negligible, it meant that he didn’t cost much prospect capital to obtain (with Luke Jackson as another throw-in with an underwater contract), and the other players mentioned in this piece were acquired either as free agents or on the waiver wire. Another way of saying that is that these are the guys who pretty much everyone else in the league passed on.
When you’ve decided to economize as much as possible, it can make sense to target players we previously employed. After all, we’ve scouted them intensively, we know their strengths and weaknesses better than anyone else, plus we have a better understanding of their cultural fit, an important consideration given how often Alex Anthopoulos talks about the importance of team chemistry.
(It’s certainly possible that his emphasis on chemistry is a meaningless platitude that allows him to answer questions without giving up any actual information. Nevertheless, if chemistry were important to him, it could be another reason for him to target retreads.)
But however sound the logic of bringing back our old friends, it didn’t work well this year. It’s a little like what happened with Mike Remlinger: the first time around, he was sensational, but the second time, he was a 40-year-old man who didn’t have it any more.
After the raft of injuries drastically changed our outlook for the season, Alex Anthopoulos more or less made the decision not to throw good money after bad. I disagreed, both then and now, because I thought that our core was strong enough that it made sense to bring in reinforcements to improve our odds for a deep October run, but I respect that Anthopoulos has to take the long view.
This offseason, however, we will need much more than another time around the bend with guys we’ve let go before. We need new blood, we need much more depth, and we need to bring it in from outside the organization.

Well said, Alex. The playoffs are a crapshoot, of course, but so are players that any team can pick up if they wanted them. And sometimes when you play craps, you get crap. And as they say in the stock market, “past returns are no guarantee of future results.” The fact that the castoff toy trio of Soler, Rosario and Pederson worked once doesn’t guarantee anything, but it doesn’t mean that Soler, Rosario, Duvall, Urshela and Merrifield might not have worked again. Instead, as they said in Animal House: “You f***** up. You trusted us.” Of course, had it worked, the other 29 teams might have just given up baseball and taken up some other profession. Just imagine the Dodgers winter meetings had they lost twice to Rosario.
Delicious as that prospect might have been, lightning had already struck on Windy Hill Road and it didn’t strike again. The good news is that with the deft extrication from Soler’s contract we enter 2025 with a blank slate for adjustments.
So I would only criticize AA if there were real deals available that he ignored to pursue these lottery tickets. I give him the benefit of the doubt that there were none.
Agree with all that, but I just want to note that it was a castoff quad of outfielders that AA acquired in 2021 who worked out, as Duvall was a retread as well. Duvall had the most regular-season WAR for the Braves of any of the four, the second most regular-season PA behind Soler, the second-most postseason PA behind Rosario, and gave the team a lot more defensive value and flexibility than the other three (though his postseason baserunning was pretty bad). If the team had held the lead in WS G5, his grand slam would be remembered like Soler’s G6 HR is, and his contributions would be remembered more than they are.
Side contest – Without looking it up, rank the four in the order of their career bWAR. There’s a 1 in 24 chance of getting it right at random. For me, even if I had a better idea of their relative values when they were productive, I couldn’t have guessed which ones were farther below 0 in their decline phases.
Exactly, JamesD – it wasn’t just a crew of retreads this year, it was a retread of the strategy!
What I’m saying here, more than anything, is that I didn’t feel like the strategy was as well-suited to the situation as I could have wished this time. As JonathanF says, I may be wrong about whether AA truly had any better options, and as you say, the strategy in 2021 was basically just a lucky coup where AA rolled a bunch of dice and they came up sixes.
Though, also, three years of aging clearly had a major negative effect for Rosario and Duvall, and arguably also Soler. There was no reason to assume that the strategy would work out particularly well; it was low-risk but low-reward.
My guess to the JamesD side contest. My picks were 1-4-2-3. So I badly misplaced the low guy, but if I’d known how many bad years he’s had, I guess I might have gotten it right.
I’d guess Duvall, Soler, Pederson, Rosario.
Has Whit Merrifield signed with anyone yet? He would be an upgrade on De La Cruz in RF and would cost little. And he could move into the utility role after Acuña returns.
Whit Merrifield isn’t that bad a player. You can do a lot worse–De La Cruz, for example. DLC has a long swing with an obvious hole. At least that’s how it always looked to me. I doubt he’s fixable, but he’s still relatively young, and it’s worth a shot.
Charlie Morton signs with the O’s. So that’s that. Man, he always stays close to home. https://x.com/Feinsand/status/1875310852645249148
I’m grateful we got such good years with him and happy he’s getting well-paid. He wasn’t getting $15M from us and I would have been nervous to offer it to him, as I wrote in my writeup. I hope he has a fantastic year back in the other league.
I got my guesses wrong, too. I figured the low man would be low, but I didn’t realize the high man would be as high as he was. But it’s worth noting that the middle two of them have roughly the same career WAR, and flip flop between #2 and #3 depending on whether you’re using rWAR or fWAR!
Just wonder what we are doing? Morton isn’t an ace but his numbers play all day long as a 4th of 5th
If you want to spend $15MM on Morton when you have a Grant Holmes for free then sure, but if you’re budget constrained, that is a bad expenditure.
Despite what AA said, it does appear like the team is cutting payroll. Maybe they told him to do so after that interview.
This off season feels like the offseason for the Dallas Cowboys did last spring when the were “all in.”
I don’t know how you can be confident about “appearances”. It’s January. The offseason isn’t over. Fans can be very impatient.
If it was going to take $15 million to get Charlie back, I guess we could find something better to do with that.
I think the plan was Max Scherzer or Justin Verlander and it didn’t work out. One of those guys for $25-$30M with a team option screams AA.
https://x.com/beaneaterb/status/1875320032642871639?s=46&t=WSNPrB2JyUoeKSn2PZsXZg
These are the Steamer projections for Holmes and ASS. That’s a 3 WAR player for the league minimum.
Steamer is a lot higher on AJSS than I am. I think he’s a future reliever.
I am not down an AJSS, but I think he needs another full season in the minors, let him just work on the craft of pitching.
Grant McAuley has confirmed the rumors that the Braves are in on Tanner Scott and Justin Verlander. Scott is going to cost $15-16M, and Verlander will undoubtedly at least be in the $20M range. So that’s the total number the Braves have been rumored to spend this offseason: around $30-35M. So if the Braves go out and spend $35M on one the best relievers on the market and then spend $20M a starting pitcher, a lot of impatient fans on Twitter (not just picking you out, B14) who have said the Braves aren’t serious enough about winning can eat some crow.
I personally hope that we don’t sign Verlander. If he’s healthy, then yes, he would be an incredible pickup. He’s one year removed from making 27 starts and pitching 162 innings with a 3.27 ERA. So if he’s healthy, he can still pitch. And I’d rather have Verlander at $20M than Morton at $15M. But we also have a ton of internal candidates to fill out the 5th and 6th spots. If Ian Anderson is healthy, I’d rather have Ian Anderson for no money. I’d like to see if ASS or Waldrep can turn the corner. Holmes has definitely earned an extended look in the rotation. Elder has a great 9th option for your rotation. Dylan Dodd is a human that technically still exists. So I just don’t know how necessary it is to pay $20M for almost proven production out of your 5th spot.
I’m sure Alex would have wanted Morton back, but not at $15M. But in a market where Walker Buehler gets $21M, Charlie must not have had interest in pitching at a 50%+ discount from 2024.
Speaking of having an absurd amount of rotation candidates, I was at the drinkery last night making my usual bad decisions but also discussing the Dodgers’ roster after the Kim and Teoscar signings. We started talking about their rotation and I thought there was some weird things with such a dominant team:
-Their SP innings leader was Gavin Stone with 140. That’s it.
-Second was Glasnow with 134. No one else pitched over 100 innings. Yes, a team that won 98 games and the World Series had exactly 2 consistent starters and only one guy made even 25 starts (Stone)
-Most of their starters average around 5 innings per start.
-8 guys made at least 10 starts.
-16 guys made at least 1 start.
So my first observation is that the Dodgers clearly don’t value consistency as much as other teams do. And especially for trading for injury-prone guys like Glasnow and signing risky pitchers like Yamamoto, they’re more concerned with maximizing upside vs. controlling downside.
In the bullpen, they had 29 guys with a positive contribution to WPA. We had 18, by comparison.
They really seem to have this “next man up” attitude to pitching where they just fill the organization with elite arms and just figure it out along the way. Oh, and they have like 8 All-Stars in their offensive lineup, so that helps too. Details.
Good points. The Dodgers won 100 games in 2023 with a pretty patchwork rotation. Having depth across the roster is something they excel at.
$20M for a proven guy in the #4 or #5 slot seems like a luxury until somebody pops a UCL. Or somebody’s shoulder hurts. Or the back spasms just won’t go away.
Unfortunately there are four big question marks in the rotation right now.
How will Strider feel when he starts pitching again? What if he still hurts?
Will Chris Sale’s back hold up like it almost did last year? His Boston time was not great.
Will Reynaldo Lopez be able to pitch a full season? He missed a lot of time last year.
Schwellenbach is still young and hasn’t had much experience with a full season’s workload.
Something will go wrong with one of those guys. Maybe all four. There will be plenty of opportunities for Holmes, Anderson, Smith-Shawver, Waldrep, Elder, Dodd and anyone else who puts up numbers on the farm. It’s also likely at least one of those guys ends up in the pen or gets traded for a reliever.
Adding players won’t detriment the best players on that list. There are many innings to be pitched. But adding some proven major leaguers will keep the worst guy on that list off the field. Whomever he may be.
If I wake up and they’ve signed Justin Verlander, I will certainly not be disappointed. The point I should’ve made was that they should just hold that money to use to take a salary dump at the deadline or something. I failed to communicate what I would do with the money instead.
https://x.com/brooks_gate/status/1875616939244241286?s=46&t=WSNPrB2JyUoeKSn2PZsXZg
That’s depressing as hell. Of course, Acuna is a huge part of the core and not on the list.
That is depressing, especially since none of the remaining ones, including Acuna, played a full and productive season in 2024. I had forgotten that Arcia was even on the team in 2021 (thought he arrived in early 2022), and I certainly didn’t remember that he mostly played LF.
At least five of them (Adrianza, Duvall, Jackson, Rosario, Soler) have left or been discarded, returned, and departed again. Guillermo Heredia is still playing in Korea, though it seems like AA prefers to bring back players who were once good/useful.
EDIT: The tweet may be a little off. The king of departing and returning, Jesse Chavez, pitched in the 2021 WS but wasn’t pictured.
Keep in mind that the Braves are likely going to use a 6 man rotation to keep guys fresh and healthy. So they need another starter for depth.
Holmes and Ian Anderson are out of options so they will likely get the first crack at 2 of those spots.
Justin Toscano was on the latest Hammer Territory podcast and he speculates the Braves don’t have a ton of money to spend this offseason. It’s not something he’s definitively reporting but it is interesting to hear that from the Braves’ AJC beat reporter.
Trade wise, AA seems like he’s in a difficult spot. A lot of our prospects are either close to the majors at positions of need (Baldwin and AJSS) or they still have room to improve their trade value (Richie/most of the international signings). I think by this summer the system will look a lot better and we’ll be better positioned to make a big trade.
Holding onto Baldwin is the correct move. Everyone knows how I feel about Murphy by now, but even if Murphy rebounds a bit, you’re better having 2 catchers. You could also do the platoon between C and DH to get Murphy ABs every day, which is probably his best chance to be a decent hitter again.
With AJSS, I think we’d probably trade him in the right deal, but he may not be as highly valued around the league as we think. Eye test says he is a reliever at best, and even then maybe not a closer. He has a long way to go to get big leaguers out consistently.
I still believe in AJSS as a starter but this is a huge year for his development. I hope he stays in the minors for the entire season like Kyle Wright in 2021. I only saw his changeup in spring training but it looks promising.
This article has some data on his pitch movement.
https://www.thedynastydugout.com/p/atlanta-braves-top-prospects-2025
On the other hand, I don’t believe in Waldrep as a starter, mostly because he can’t throw strikes consistently, and I would trade him now before he’s forced to the bullpen. As a bullpen piece, I think he has some real upside, because he can throw his fastball harder and hitters will see less of that insane splitter.
Now DOB is speculating the Braves are trying to avoid what I assume is the first luxury tax threshold, which is worrisome.
https://x.com/DOBrienATL/status/1876323564573634914
Good content and insightful comments as always on this blog. I’d be very happy if they sign Verlander, but somehow I doubt it. It does feel like they’re trying to get under the luxury tax this season, for whatever reason. I’d be very interested to see the financial report that comes out from Liberty Media this year.
That’s a no on Verlander. Off to the Giants for the same money as Charlie. I’m not sure who’s even left to sign now, so most likely Fried and Charlie’s innings will be filled in-house.
Flaherty who was one of the top 5 available starters is now the top available starter. He is probably too expensive for us.
I look at the luxury tax talk this way—maybe management is being realistic about where we are. I made a post about how much of our lineup might be replacement level next year (Albies, Murphy, Kelenic, Arcia), and while it got flamed, if it’s a fair analysis, we probably need a lot to contend. Maybe we are playing the intermediate game where you think you’re better off saving your bullets for 2026.
Max Scherzer is still out there too.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the move is to “reset” the luxury tax overage counter. I don’t love it. Liberty makes a ton of money off The Battery and can afford to pay a bit of tax. But maybe the lost draft pick is the sticking point. I hope it’s just that and not purely financial.
It’s also possible that some of these free agents took less/same money to play elsewhere. We don’t have the same school system that Colorado does.
New thread: https://bravesjournal.com/2025/01/08/2024-braves-player-review-one-mo-gain-with-jesse-chavez/