Everything is going right for our Braves. In defeating the Tigers 5-2, the record is now 21-9—the best record after 30 games since 2000. As you know, our main division rivals, the Phillies and the Mets, are each off to their worst 30 game starts this millennium. I haven’t looked that last one up. But if these aren’t the worst starts for either in 25 years, they are certainly the most disappointing for the two fanbases. It’s pretty lucky to be playing so well while the other two division favorites are stinking up the joint.
Hall of Fame pitcher Lefty Gomez often said “I’d rather be lucky than good.” Gomez was lucky to spend much of his career with the 1930’s Yankees. But he was also a fine pitcher. The Braves tonight were like Gomez. This team is very good indeed, but tonight they were also lucky. Martin Perez went five shutout innings, lowering his ERA to 2.22 on the season. In his last three outings, he’s given up one earned run in 16 innings, and tonight, he surrendered just two hits in five innings. Sounds pretty dominating. So what was lucky about that? Perez walked four Tigers and needed 91 pitches to get through five, and he had seven full counts. But in at least four of those full counts he struck the batter out swinging. You’d think that a pitcher who walks four and throws that many pitches in five innings has poor control. But that wouldn’t really describe Perez. Tonight at least, he reminded me of Tom Glavine. He pitched all around the edges of the plate, and never threw one down the middle. He never “gave in to the hitter,” to use a Glavine phrase. Glavine would rather walk a batter than throw it in the heart of the plate. Perez is the same. I’d call that good and lucky.
Didier Fuentes, who was called up today when Dylan Lee went on paternity leave, followed Perez with two scoreless, and Kinley pitched a scoreless eighth. Bummer lost the shutout in the ninth on a two run homer, but fortunately there was a five run cushion so no real harm.
The Braves had nine hits, six for extra bases (five doubles and a homer). You’d think a team with that many extra base hits was really knocking the cover off the ball. But they were lucky in those hits. Of those six XBH’s, only one was over 100 mph—an Acuna leadoff double. In the third, Yaz stroked an 89 mph double down the line in left, and Ronald drove him in with an 80 mph double down the left field line (and later scored on an Olson sac fly, much to Roger’s delight). In the seventh, Dubon stroked a 95 mph double, and was driven in by a 78 mph single by Yaz. In the eighth, Olson knocked an 80 mph double to right, and Ozzie followed with a 98 mph home run into the visiting bullpen.
Although most of these hits weren’t crushed, they weren’t entirely lucky. They weren’t slow grounders that squeaked through or weak popups that happen to fall. They were all hit pretty solidly. When you do that, especially at a good launch angle to the outfield, and with a little luck, good things will happen.
Going forward, this team will go through streaks when they aren’t very lucky. I think they are good enough offensively and defensively to overcome those. They are also good enough that when they have a little luck, they are nearly unbeatable.
Tomorrow JR Ritchie makes his second big league start against the best pitcher in the game. You might think that is unlucky for him. But if he pitches as well as he did last week against the Nats, and the Braves have a little luck against Skubal, it will be a night to remember.

So I may have jumped the gun last time, this current 25-game stretch is our best of the season so far: 18-7, topping our first 25 games of 17-8 ball. If we can do better than 3-3 in our next six, then we’ll have a new best 25 game stretch.
I just checked, the 2000 Braves actually started 20-6, with a 15-game win streak! Now that’s impressive. I vaguely remember that start, following it on the old baseball.com website.
I remember that win steak well. I had printed the Braves schedule in calendar form so it was all on one sheet of paper, and put it on my bedroom wall, and would mark each game with the score and a blue W or red L. Or was it a red W/blue L?…In any case, lots of W’s.
If Branch Rickey manages to be known in the year 2126, it will be for his quote: “Luck is the residue of design.” While there are of course other quotes that maintain similar sentiments, this appears to be one of the rare cases where something attributed to someone is a appropriately sourced. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2024/10/11/luck-residue/ I would put it somewhat differently, if less memorably. Luck exists, but separating luck from skill is harder than it looks.
In fact, the amusing thing is that while luck is the residue of design, you can turn it around and make skill the residue of luck. The way we know that there is skill in baseball is by imagining that it had no skill and comparing the spread of results across teams under a pure luck hypothesis with actual results. The residue is skill. The statistically minded reader can see the proof here: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2014/06/27/quantifying-luck-vs-skill-sports/
That last link, btw, paves the way to disentangling luck and skill for this year’s team. When looking at baseball records, you should always add 37 wins and 37 losses to their records to get an estimate of how good they really are. Thus, a 21-9 team probably isn’t a 113 win team (though they might be!). Our best current estimate ought to be that they’re a 58-46 team, which translates to 90 wins. That’s still better than anybody else, though. The Phillies and Mets, at 10-19, become 47-56, or 74 win teams.
That’s way over my head. Not fully understanding math and statistics is one reason I wound up in law school. Like many in my trade, I have limited understanding of many things but mastery of none.
Still, it’s pretty fascinating stuff for a layperson. I do have a lay sense that chance plays a larger role in outcomes than many of us want to believe. But skill does matter too, of course. It’s good to see it quantified.
Thanks much for the link. The Tom Tango derivation is super-clever if — as well-noted in the discussion and comments — the result is non-intuitive. But the way he sets the problem up is very intuitive: talent is the difference between the team record we observe and what we might be observing if each game were a coin flip.
A couple of casual remarks:
Of course, even in the situation where each MLB game were a coin flip, this would not mean that that there was no talent or skill involved! As Bill James pointed out half a century ago, talent or skill is not normally distributed in MLB: We are looking at the extreme right-tail of some other distribution of talent in a more general population. Rather, the coin flip analogy is saying that conditional on all teams working mightily to collectively identify this high-end talent tail, but doing so in a manner that essentially equalizes talent across teams, all resulting outcomes when they play each other are essentially “luck.”
The blog’s author, Andrew Gelman, remarks that “they’re doing hierarchical Bayes with a point estimate for the group-level variance.” But nagging somewhere — in all of us, in the comments — is the idea that not all of the teams are doing an equally good job of identifying talent. Sometimes this plays out as schandenfreude, i.e., the payroll of the Mets versus their performance. On the other hand, if we really want to predict end of the season results, we probably want to be regressing observed results toward some better hunch of a particular team’s latent talent, i.e., a model featuring something like payroll or last year’s personnel WAR to capture better heterogeneity in talent.
Not to take anything away from the usefulness and ingenuity of the “add 34 wins and 34 losses” heuristic!
Finally, formulae be darned, as the ABs roll along, I find it harder and harder to believe that Austin Riley is having a run of bad luck. I hope I am wrong.
Looking at records over the first 30 games brings back memories of how good the late 90’s Braves were. Here are the first 30 game records by year: 1997–22-8; 1998–20-10; 1999–20-10; 2000–21-9. They averaged better than 101 wins over that stretch. Yet what most of us remember about those seasons is failure in the playoffs: losing to inferior Marlins and Padres teams in 97 and 98, getting swept by the Yankees in 1999, and getting swept by the cards in 2000. It’s as if the Jim Leyritz series in 1996 ruined that team for years. It’s a shame we can’t appreciate how remarkable that dynasty was. And it doesn’t help our memories of the Braves that the Yankees won four WS during this same time.
Which brings us back to luck. As we’ve discussed many time, outcomes in the playoffs, while not random, are determined far more by chance than we like to think.
We didn’t always win our last game, but those were some terrific teams.
Nonetheless, this is some of the bad luck I tend to remember:
Our coming Sean Murphy reactivation may bring a major improvement to one area. Per the minor league report on Batter Power, he was 4 for 4 on ABS challenges last night.
Assuming Ritchie does OK and sticks, how does adding Strider and Kim make us better? Seems like the SP has been great and Dubon/Mateo have been great at SS. I could argue the same about Murphy but Heim/Farmer have not exactly set the world on fire. Although Dom Smith has covered DH pretty well.
Dubon and Mateo have both been plus defenders at SS by Outs Above Average, so there’s no denying their value there. However, both guys are running below average xwOBAs (.301 for Dubon, .295 for Mateo) that they are outhitting by a significant amount. Kim isn’t a crazy good hitter, but he’s projected at a 96 wRC+ this season, and has been an above-average defender every year except for his injury-riddled 2025.
If Yaz continues to struggle, having Dubon available to play LF more often would be valuable. As for Mateo, he can fill in at SS admirably if the Braves need to give Kim the occasional day off, and can still provide some value with his speed and baserunning skills.
Dubon and Mateo have been great, but they were never really intended to be everyday players (or semi-regular, in the case of Mateo). This team is at its strongest when those guys are playing their roles and forming the core of a really solid bench.
It frees up Dubon to move around and spell guys more. He can play in place of slumping hitters such as Yaz or Riley.
Dubon had a hot, hot couple-few weeks but he’s returning to earth. Putting him in his rightful role as a super-utility guy makes our team so much better. We’ve said it before, but he’s got Martin Prado/Omar Infante written all over him. And Walt is going to use him properly, which is even better.
Like Dubón, Elder and Perez have been great in the early going, and we wouldn’t be where we are without them. But like Dubon we can’t expect them to keep up this pace. Like Dubon they bring depth, to the rotation (always needed) and much better long relief options if necessary than J Suarez or Payamps.
I uderstand all these arguments but I am the “don’t upset the applecart” type. If Dubon does come down to Earth and Perez turns into a pumpkin (I believe in Elder, actually) then a change makes sense but I’m not sure it does before that. Especially as Kim as an average hitter. Now, if Kim goes on a heater just count me as wrong…..
I like dumping Carrasco. Bummer proved that Lee is essential. I sure would like to see Harris or Dodd get a better shot. And I think Karinchak would be better than Payamps.
I still think the Kim deal was good, but Dubon may have been an all-time great pickup and Mateo/Perez may have been great emergency signs.
Dylan Lee is already back, Carrasco DFA the corresponding move.
Kelenic got called up by the White Sox.
30 strikeouts in 82 plate appearances at AAA Charlotte. Woof
I mentioned Walt in another comment, but he deserves his own comment. Man, I love Walt Weiss so far. He deserved this job, and I’m glad that the Braves played the optics game properly by conducting a full search and then announcing him. If they just announced him right when Snitker retired, that would not have looked good. But he’s just got this energy to him — even if he wasn’t tackling players — that I just think works so well. He’s not a Tony Vitello that is just going to rub players the wrong way, but he’s got a nice energy to him. They’re playing hard for him, he’s actually pressing buttons vs. Snit’s laidback style, I love it.
Says ESPN: Kelenic was batting .202 with six home runs, 18 RBIs and 16 runs scored in 26 games with Charlotte this season.
He must have went on a heater. I looked a couple of weeks ago and he had zero XBH and a 50% K-rate.
Speaking of challenges, it makes sense to me that catchers would be better than batters due to vantage point. So I looked it up and saw that it is indeed the case. So far catchers are a bit over 60% and batters and pitchers are in the mid 40’s.
There’s also an emotional component. The catcher is more detached, while batter and pitcher are directly invested.
What I’d like to see much less of is batter challenging strike 2 when the bases are empty. Last night it cost us a chance to challenge a clear missed strike 3 in a high leverage 8th inning. Didn’t impact the outcome but it sure could’ve.
If we did nothing else but say you can only challenge strike 3 with men on base, that would improve our EV from challenges. As it is, it’s not just that we’re wrong, it’s that even if we were right it likely wouldn’t matter to the game outcome. All batter challenges are gonna be close to 50/50 anyway. Umps don’t tend to miss the obvious ones. So the main thing it to challenge when the stakes are high so when you’re right it matters.
I’m guessing Ritchie will be going back to Gwinnett after tonight for another reliever, with said reliever going back down for Strider on his day.
Seen all I need to see of Austin Riley for the next.. how long is his contract? Seven years?
All I need to see for the next 7 years..
Win, win, win.
Yeah baby.
Braves are living WELL. Goodness. Rookie vs Skubal and still got it done. Our SP had fewer MLB starts than their SP has Cy Young awards, lol.
Jerry reed wrote a song about this team.
We’re gonna do what they say can’t be done
That was so satisfying—this team is really special (and fun!). And Matty O is hitting like an MVP.
Weiss says Ritchie will make another start.
I sure hope so. I think he should not go down at all and should stick until at least he fails. How about that kid!!! We have several other pitchers that should go first – Payamps, J.Suarez, Bummer, even Fuentes or Perez. And Reynaldo looked good. Strider and Iglesias will be very welcome.
Recapped