For many advanced metric sites, the 2023 Braves have the loftiest of projections, with many ranking them to be the team with the most wins in the 2023 season. While that projection scares the Dickens out of me, I don’t think it’s too far off. With the newly balanced schedule, the Braves, Mets, and Phillies won’t be able to beat up on each other and suppress each other’s wins, and I’m sure that’s why those 3 teams are expected to win a bunch of games.

However, what areas are the Braves at the tippity-top and which are in the back of the top-10?

In this series, we will look at Fangraphs projections for the team in every facet to see what checks out…or not. Today’s piece will focus on the Braves Starting Pitching.

Braves Starting Pitching Projections

According to Fangraphs, the Braves have the 6th best Starting Pitching rotation in all of baseball behind (in order) the Yankees, Brewers, Rangers, Mutts, and Phaillies.

While Fangraphs always keeps their projections conservative, the Braves SP staff’s expected fWAR total is 14.1. Here’s a breakdown for each player’s fWAR:

Breakdown: Fried carried a 5.0 fWAR last year, Strider, who should be considered the Braves 2nd starter, put up 4.9 in 131.2 innings. While I’m not going to get on my high horse, I believe both will surpass their projections. Both for Morton and Wright seem accurate, but I think there’s 1/2 fWAR up or down for both pitchers. From there, the spectacles get foggier. Both Soroka and Ian are hyper-focusing on their weaknesses. For Soroka, it’s a new delivery to offset pressure on the achilles. For Ian, it’s pitch development. The last 3, it’s just been too much up and down and not enough results to formulate a real projection, so it’s just throwing at a dartboard. Barbecue Sauce.

I think there’s room for this starting staff to rank anywhere from 3 to 10 based on health. If one of Fried or Strider have to sit for an extended period, there aren’t guys to replace their production. If Wright, Soroka, or Ian go down, there likely isn’t a major impact to the staff. So…what do I think about the ranking? I’d say it’s an accurate assessment.