You’re only as old as you feel, so they tell me. But as an economist I rely on what the market is telling me, and the fact that 92% of the TV ads I see are for prescription drugs is an elegant summary of my place in the world; I’m seen as old, diseased and gullible. Of course, maybe I just don’t understand the other ads and my estimation process is skewed. Or maybe I’m just old, diseased and gullible. But permit me a few moments of old-guy lugubriousness and old-guy optimism before your next plate of wings.



Anyway, the Super Bowl today marks the death of another football season. I’m not much of an NFL fan, and haven’t been for a long time, but I watch. For me, the big interest today is Sam Darnold. I have a friend who’s a Jets fan. This is extremely unusual up here where I live, where the Giants are king. The Mara family is based in my home town. I even know more Patriots fans than Jets fans. But there are a few eccentric outliers — is there any wonder that I end drinking with them? In any case, my friend Dan said to me, when the Jets cast Darnold loose: “He’s a good QB, but he’ll never win a Super Bowl.” I argued with him then that there’s no way he could know that, and I’ve waited for severl years (not all that many to be honest) to make my point. My biggest fear is that Seattle will win and Dan won’t remember his overconfident prediction.
The next thing the Super Bowl reminds me of is the death this week of my favorite QB from my youth: Sonny Jurgensen. When there were fewer football teams, there were fewer star QBs, and Sonny was generally regarded in my circles as really good but distinctly a notch below Johnny Unitas, Bart Starr, Fran Tarkenton and the last Jets QB to win a Super Bowl. But not to me, and sitting here 60 years later I couldn’t tell you why. But I don’t give these things up easily, and 91 is a pretty good run.
But enough about football. Sticking to death, though, the fact that Mickey Lolich also died this week reminds me that every baseball fan I knew as a kid had an AL team they rooted for as well as the Braves. The 1968 Tigers captivated me, and the debate (Lolich or McClain?) was a fun debate. Also, at 12 years old, it was my first insight into the notion that some statistics were more meaningful than others, and my lifetime argument against the Win was set in motion. Nobody has those debates any more, because the Win really is now irrelevant because of changes in the game. The Win was far more important in 1968 than it is today, But my defense of Lolich had to overcome the Cult of 31. And I was able to use a little statistical jiu iitsu to point out that if wins are that important, 3 of them in a World Series must be pretty damn good. Mickey was 85.
And that brings me to tragic death. Terrance Gore wasn’t a great baseball player, but he leveraged the skills he did have in a way that was second-to-none. To start with, he played in 112 regular season games and 11 postseason games. Take that, Ernie Banks. He had three World Series rings. In those 123 games he got his teams 1% closer to World Championships. On a per-game basis, I’m not sure there was anyone better. 34? Ridiculous.
So the football season ends today, and the cycle of rebirth is upon us. Pitchers and catchers report tomorrow.

JonathanF, I’ve been a baseball fan since 1969 and I latched onto the Braves and the Orioles (you can guess which team I hate), but I was also a Tigers fan since my local team Montgomery Rebels, yes, Rebels) was the AA team of the Tigers. I remember the Cardinals vs. Tigers arguments. As a lefty myself I was always prone to prefer lefties (McNally, Lolich, Reed, etc…. except I was a big Niekro fan). I think Lolich is better because of longevity (lust like Mantle was better than Maris). McLain had one great season (and a couple of good seasons) and flamed out pretty quickly. But I saw Bird, Whitaker, Trammell, etc.. pretty early on.
I love Lou Whitaker. He was a fine player who hit another gear in his mid-30’s. He had his best season at 34. He posted a career-high .890 OPS at age 38 and then he just retired. I think he could’ve kept hitting .290 like Julio Franco well into his 40’s. There were rumors we were going to trade for him and then sign him but we never could get it done. Could’ve used his bat during our lean middle infield years of the early 90s.
I totally forgot who was on those 1968 Cardinals/Tigers teams. I had to look it up in Baseball Reference. Gibson. Carlton (before Phillies), Brock, McCarver, Maris, Flood, McClain, Lolich, Freehan, Kaline, Cash, etc… Tigers even had Eddie Matthews and Pat Dobson (before he won 20 games with the Orioles). Cardinals had a very young Ted Simmons and Mike Torrez (before HE won 20 games for the Orioles).
I think it was the best World Series until 1991, but I’m biased.
Well, 1975 (BoSox/Cincy) was pretty good. For me, that one, ’91 & ’25 were the best WS I’ve seen.
I was in kindergarten for the ’68 Series, so I don’t remember that one at all. First one I remember was 1970 — the Brooks Robinson showcase series.
The ’68 Tigers were always a fun team to play in APBA table baseball. I particularly liked Earl Wilson, their 3rd starter, who was one of the great power-hitting pitchers of all time. He had 35 career HRs & that year, he had 7 HRs & I liked to use him as a pinch hitter, usually for Ray Oyler, their SS who hit .135. Still hate the DH.
Check out Mickey Lolich’s 1971 & ’72 seasons — a whole lotta pitching goin’ on. He went 47-28, racked up 8.5 & 7.4 WAR, had 42 CGs & threw 722.1 IP (incl. 19 IP in the ’72 ALCS). Not quite the IP level of the recently departed Wilbur Wood (a lefty knuckleballer), but still nuts.
Wished I’d seen Jurgensen in his prime. I just remember the oft-injured Sonny in the George Allen-era Redskins, which saw Billy Kilmer launching wobbly ducks left & right. QBs like Kilmer & Joe Kapp would never make an NFL team these days.
Re: Super Bowl
Outside of the betting intrigue, a pretty meh SB. I did like seeing Maria Taylor interviewing Mike Macdonald at the end — 2 UGA grads briefly hogging the spotlight.
That ’75 series was a classic. So much so that it got a long mention in Good Will Hunting. That may have been the only series that had “real” excitement for me.
Marcel Ozuna signs with the Pirates… 1 year/$12 M.
If he’s hitting by the trade deadline, he’ll probably be wearing another uniform.
That’s a good value. I think he was hampered by his hip and his 2026 will probably be somewhere between his 2024 and 2025–still really good. I wish we could’ve kept his bat, but with Profar’s glove, that’s too many bat-only players.
I was listening to a fantasy baseball podcast, and they said the average 1B OPS is at one of its lowest points in recent memory. I’m really not sure why Ozuna didn’t want to grab a first baseman’s mitt. Does he really need to be the only non-Shohei DH only in the league?
As much as I want to be frustrated with not getting max value out of the Bummer, Strider, Harris, and Ozzie deals, it really could be worse:
https://x.com/mlbtraderumors/status/2021046497458954693?s=46&t=WSNPrB2JyUoeKSn2PZsXZg
Castellanos is paid $20M to be a league average hitter and one of the worst defenders at a position you need offense. That’s rough.
Speaking of bad contracts, I went down the YouTube rabbit hole yesterday and saw a video about bad contracts. In 1995, Terry Mulholland and Jose Bautista (not that Jose Bautista) accounted for almost $60M in inflation adjusted bad contract value for the Giants. If the Giants had even just signed replacement lebel pitchers for those spots, they probably win the NL and not the Braves.
Nick Castellanos… an iron glove to match his sweet disposition.
And it’s not like the Phils could ever DH him.
Schwellenbach to the 60-day IL with arm trouble.
And it begins.
Maybe betting on everyone to be healthy wasn’t smart. Time to sign Bassitt?
With Verlander (and Martinez and Civale) gone, you’d think the Braves would jump on Bassitt or Giolito.
I think the Braves have to bring in a starting pitcher now.
The Braves probably already should have brought in a SP. Now they really need to.
What is the reason on the 60 day list, now? 60 days is April 11. Once a move is made, it can’t be reversed. But, it still counts against the 40 man roster (right)? I guess the 60 day list becomes NOT subject to the 40 man rule on season opening day. But that seems to provide little value (as compared to the 15).
Maybe this is about “if we have to pull this pin on this grenade it is better to do it now.
cliff, according to what I read, the “60 days” does not start until the beginning of the season. It is a way to clear a roster spot sooner.
https://x.com/drs2982/status/2021244497934344352?s=20
Nacho getting work at catcher.
https://x.com/gvedak/status/2021256472240300362?s=20
I wouldn’t read too much into this…yet. It used to be common for utility infielders to be the third catcher. Mike Mordecai could do it, and it’s just smart planning. Would’ve helped us in all those years of stupidity where we didn’t pinch hit Rossy because “what if McCann got hurt?”
Braves sign catcher Jonah Heim… 1 yr/$1.5 M.
Wonder if that means Murphy isn’t progressing as quickly as hoped.
I think the expectation is we will be without Murphy, at least for regular behind the plate duties, until May, possibly even June. Makes sense to get a stopgap. They should not rush a torn hip labrum for a catcher.
It’s not a good look for neither Schwellenbach nor the Braves that he ramped his velo up to 99-101, broke his elbow, and may go a calendar year without throwing a live game pitch.
This is giving me terrible heartburn for an epic flameout.
I agree. He was just fine at 97. Whatever happened to teaching these guys to pitch? What I wouldn’t give for Leo Mazzone
It was one of the most predictable injuries that even the trolls on Twitter were clearly calling out. And the way the beat writers wouldn’t even acknowledge the potential that this would happen tells you all you need to know about the quality of information we receive from them.
Braves are probably stuck with who they’ve got. Signing Bassit will push them deeper into the CBT and will leave little for deadline acquisitions.
New Post